2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/702/2/911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACHANDRASURVEY OF THE X-RAY PROPERTIES OF BROAD ABSORPTION LINE RADIO-LOUD QUASARS

Abstract: This work presents the results of a Chandra study of 21 broad absorption line (BAL) radio-loud quasars (RLQs). We conducted a Chandra snapshot survey of 12 bright BAL RLQs selected from SDSS/FIRST data and possessing a wide range of radio and C IV absorption properties. Optical spectra were obtained nearly contemporaneously with the Hobby-Eberly Telescope; no strong flux or BAL variability was seen between epochs. In addition to the snapshot targets, we include in our sample 9 additional BAL RLQs possessing ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the specific case of another FRII radio galaxy, 3C 111, the UFO mass outflow rate (∼0.1−1 M yr −1 , i.e., similar to that of PID352) is much greater than the outflow funnelled into the jet (Ṁ out,j = 0.0005−0.005 M yr −1 ; Tombesi et al 2012b), implying that the UFO is much more massive than the jet, although its kinetic power can be one order of magnitude lower. Placed in a broader context, these results are suggestive of considerable feedback onto the host galaxy by winds and jets (see also the discussion in Miller et al 2009 about the co-existence of outflows and jets in radio-loud quasars and their connection with X-ray binaries).…”
Section: Radio Datamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, in the specific case of another FRII radio galaxy, 3C 111, the UFO mass outflow rate (∼0.1−1 M yr −1 , i.e., similar to that of PID352) is much greater than the outflow funnelled into the jet (Ṁ out,j = 0.0005−0.005 M yr −1 ; Tombesi et al 2012b), implying that the UFO is much more massive than the jet, although its kinetic power can be one order of magnitude lower. Placed in a broader context, these results are suggestive of considerable feedback onto the host galaxy by winds and jets (see also the discussion in Miller et al 2009 about the co-existence of outflows and jets in radio-loud quasars and their connection with X-ray binaries).…”
Section: Radio Datamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We have recently completed a systematic Chandra study of the X-ray properties of 21 radio-loud BAL quasars (12 new and 9 archival observations; Miller et al 2009). Our new Chandra snapshot observations targeted the optically brightest radio-loud BAL quasars found in SDSS Data Release 3.…”
Section: An X-ray Survey Of Bright Representative Radio-loud Bal Quamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other studies, however, find that after accounting for intrinsic absorption (Luo et al 2013) or magnification of X-ray emission viewed from large inclination angles (Morabito et al 2014), BAL quasars are X-ray weak compared to non-BAL objects. Moreover, the degree of X-ray weakness for radio-loud and radio-quiet BAL quasars is different, with the radio-loud ones being less X-ray weak than radio-quiet ones, compared to non-BAL quasars (Miller et al 2009). A simple scenario suggested by a few authors says that the X-ray continuum of radio-loud BAL quasars is a superposition of disk/corona and small-scale jet X-ray emission Kunert-Bajraszewska et al 2009;Miller et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the degree of X-ray weakness for radio-loud and radio-quiet BAL quasars is different, with the radio-loud ones being less X-ray weak than radio-quiet ones, compared to non-BAL quasars (Miller et al 2009). A simple scenario suggested by a few authors says that the X-ray continuum of radio-loud BAL quasars is a superposition of disk/corona and small-scale jet X-ray emission Kunert-Bajraszewska et al 2009;Miller et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%