1983
DOI: 10.3758/bf03205899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A JND-scale/category-scale convergence in taste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean Wrs for sweet stimuli, .13 (young) and .16 (elderly), were somewhat smaller than the value of .20 reported by Pfaffmann, Bartoshuk, and McBurney (1971), but larger than the values of .10 and .08 reported by Lundgren, Pangborn, Barylko-Pikeilna, and Daget (1976). The Wrs in the present study were consistent with the value of .17 reported by Schutz and Pilgrim (1957), and the value of .13 calculated from McBride (1983). The average bitter Wrs of .40 (Young subjects) and -i .27 (elderly subjects) were higher than those previously reported, although the young subjects generated ratios close to that reported by Schutz and Pilgrim (.30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean Wrs for sweet stimuli, .13 (young) and .16 (elderly), were somewhat smaller than the value of .20 reported by Pfaffmann, Bartoshuk, and McBurney (1971), but larger than the values of .10 and .08 reported by Lundgren, Pangborn, Barylko-Pikeilna, and Daget (1976). The Wrs in the present study were consistent with the value of .17 reported by Schutz and Pilgrim (1957), and the value of .13 calculated from McBride (1983). The average bitter Wrs of .40 (Young subjects) and -i .27 (elderly subjects) were higher than those previously reported, although the young subjects generated ratios close to that reported by Schutz and Pilgrim (.30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The standards for caffeine were .0025 M, .005 M, and .01 M. Six comparison stimuli were prepared for each standard, three being more concentrated than the standard and three less concentrated. The six comparison stimuli for each standard were .70 %, .82 %, .94 %, 1.06%, 1.18%, and 1.30% of the standard concentration (see McBride, 1983). The levels selected for the discrimination task were determined by pretesting with a recognition task, to be sure that the stimuli to be presented in the JND experiment were actually perceptible.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(These data have been published in McBride, 1983, and are shown here again to allow easy comparison with the fructose and glucose data.) Over the concentration range used, there is close approximation to a straight line in a semilog plot (Fechner's law), and the ratings were fitted against log sucrose concentration by the method of least squares.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…13r-------r----,-----,----~~~~~-s ession is no different from that suggested after iteration: Once again, it appears that subjects made their judgments in an absolute manner, unaffected by immediate context. Two reasons have been suggested for this absence of stimulus spacing bias (McBride, 1983). First, with only four stimuli presented at each session, there actually is less "context" than in most psychophysical experiments, and the stimulus distribution is less likely to affect judgment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation