1977
DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12497887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Key to the Classification of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors

Abstract: The cutaneous mechanoreceptors of the cat can be assigned to one of 11 groups by using physiologic tests performed with hand-held stimulators. The method of classification is described, and the validity and utility of this classification scheme are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A laminectomy was performed to expose the entire L5 dorsal root and recordings were made in teased dorsal root filaments of single units driven by sural nerve stimulation as described previously (Lewin and McMahon, 1991). Each single unit activated by electrical stimulation of the sural nerve was characterized as to adequate stimulus (Horch et al, 1977) with the aid of a dissecting microscope so that individual hairs could be manipulated. Conduction velocity, receptive field size and location, and von Frey threshold were also noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A laminectomy was performed to expose the entire L5 dorsal root and recordings were made in teased dorsal root filaments of single units driven by sural nerve stimulation as described previously (Lewin and McMahon, 1991). Each single unit activated by electrical stimulation of the sural nerve was characterized as to adequate stimulus (Horch et al, 1977) with the aid of a dissecting microscope so that individual hairs could be manipulated. Conduction velocity, receptive field size and location, and von Frey threshold were also noted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an afferent unit was isolated, its conduction velocity was estimated from the conduction time and distance between the stimulating and recording electrodes, and the unit was functionally characterized from responses evoked with hand-held probes. Following the criteria proposed by Horch, Tuckett & Burgess (1977), G hair receptors were found to be responsive to movement of single guard hairs and to conduct at Aa velocities (> 28 m/sec). They were also differentiable by hand into three overlapping subcategories based upon their adaptation to step-like displacements of hairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eighteen type II receptors tested were easily distinguished from other slowly adapting receptor types using the techniques and criteria described by Horch et al (1977). All of the units tested had a resting discharge (1-17 Hz).…”
Section: Type II Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receptive properties of afferent units with evoked responses to dorsal root stimulation were examined with hand-held stimulators following previous classifications (Burgess & Perl, 1967;Bessou & Perl, 1969;Bessou, Burgess, Perl & Taylor, 1971;Burgess & Perl, 1973;Horch, Tuckett & Burgess, 1977;Shea & Perl, 1985). The small physical size of the animals, receptive fields in partially shielded locations, and the limited time for observation, particularly for C fibre units, precluded use of devices permitting detailed quantitative description of stimulus intensity.…”
Section: Afferent Receptive Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%