2010
DOI: 10.1163/22119434-900000294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A key to the second instar larvae of the Thripidae of the Western Palaearctic region (Thysanoptera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
77
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Adults of all species were identified using the keys of zur Strassen (2003) and Schliephake and Klimt (1979). Larvae were identified according to the key of Vierbergen et al (2010). Some of the specimens were mounted in Berlese fluid, or permanent slides of them were prepared according to the recommendation of Mound and Kibby (1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adults of all species were identified using the keys of zur Strassen (2003) and Schliephake and Klimt (1979). Larvae were identified according to the key of Vierbergen et al (2010). Some of the specimens were mounted in Berlese fluid, or permanent slides of them were prepared according to the recommendation of Mound and Kibby (1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short third antennal joint and the pointed terminal joint distinguish the Þrst instar of T. tabaci, whereas the antenna of the second instar is more slender and the terminal joint is rounded at the tip. Recently, a comprehensive identiÞcation key to the second instar larvae of 130 species of Thripidae, including T. tabaci, has been published by Vierbergen et al (2010).…”
Section: Morphology Development and Reproduction Of T Tabacimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males and females were separately identified only in the case of the TSWV vector species T. tabaci and F. occidentalis. Regarding Thysanoptera larvae, only the TSWV vectors T. tabaci and F. occidentalis were identified based on the work of Vierbergen and Nakahara (1998) and Vierbergen et al (2010). Among larval stages, only the second was considered because microscopic diagnostic methods are not suitable to determine specimens in their first larval stage to species level.…”
Section: Investigations Into Sweet Pepper and Their Surroundings In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%