2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A kinetic model of copper-to-copper direct bonding under thermal compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact regions were under severe compressive stress while the non-contact regions (voids) were subjected to less severe or no stress. This leads to a stress gradient where Cu atoms diffuse from the high localized to lower stress regions [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. These Cu atoms slowly fill up voids and eventually form a bonding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact regions were under severe compressive stress while the non-contact regions (voids) were subjected to less severe or no stress. This leads to a stress gradient where Cu atoms diffuse from the high localized to lower stress regions [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. These Cu atoms slowly fill up voids and eventually form a bonding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the (111) surface has the highest diffusivity among all the crystallographic planes in face-centered cubic (FCC) crystals, this is due to the fact that the (111) plane is the most densely packed surface which contributes to high atomic diffusivity [ 13 , 14 ]. The bonding mechanism is attributed to surface creep, which is atomic diffusion under stress gradient at elevated temperatures [ 15 ]. Thus, direct bonding can be completed at low temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low-temperature bonding technology and reliable connection interface greatly influence electronic systems’ performance and service life, especially when packaging density dramatically increases with device scaling [ 2 , 3 ]. Traditional surface bonding techniques in electronic assembly rely on high-temperature processes such as reflow soldering [ 4 , 5 ] and thermo-compression bonding [ 6 ], which can lead to undesirable thermal damage, toxic solder materials pollution, and a thermal mismatch at the bonding interface. Recently various nanometal materials such as metal nanowires, nanoparticles, and nanocones-based surface bonding are being studied to lower the bonding temperature and pressure [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%