2005
DOI: 10.1021/jm049314d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Knowledge-Based Energy Function for Protein−Ligand, Protein−Protein, and Protein−DNA Complexes

Abstract: We developed a knowledge-based statistical energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes by using 19 atom types and a distance-scale finite ideal-gas reference (DFIRE) state. The correlation coefficients between experimentally measured protein-ligand binding affinities and those predicted by the DFIRE energy function are around 0.63 for one training set and two testing sets. The energy function also makes highly accurate predictions of binding affinities of protein-protein and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
285
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
285
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter, η, is an arbitrary constant that can be modified either to estimate freeenergy differences 27 or to tune the strength of the DFIRE energy term versus other energy terms. The histograms N obs in this work were obtained from analysis of a culled set of 1836 PDB structures from the PISCES server 38 which had better than 1.8-Å resolution and were less than 30% homologous to each other.…”
Section: Sponsoring/monitoring Agency Name(s) and Address(es) 10 Spomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter, η, is an arbitrary constant that can be modified either to estimate freeenergy differences 27 or to tune the strength of the DFIRE energy term versus other energy terms. The histograms N obs in this work were obtained from analysis of a culled set of 1836 PDB structures from the PISCES server 38 which had better than 1.8-Å resolution and were less than 30% homologous to each other.…”
Section: Sponsoring/monitoring Agency Name(s) and Address(es) 10 Spomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scatter diagrams of these scores versus the experimentally determined IC 50 values for the test compounds showed that the measured IC 50 values most closely correlated with the G score (values listed in TABLE TWO). The G score is related to the binding free energy (G b ) by the empirically determined relationship ⌬G b ϭ (G score)/4 (reflecting the uniform weighting of the four Flex parameters in our analysis) (43,44). Apparent dissociation constants (K D ) for ligand transport interactions were then derived from the relationship K D ϭ exp(⌬G b /RT).…”
Section: M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays there are several receptor based VS methods available, including AutoDock (Zhang et al, 2005), FlexX (Xing et al, 2004), Glide (Friesner & Banks, 2004), FlexScreen (Kokh & Wenzel, 2008), and ICM (Bursulaya et al, 2003), each of them having different technical features. Most modern methods use an atomistic representation of the protein and the ligand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%