2022
DOI: 10.1137/21m1450392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lagged Particle Filter for Stable Filtering of Certain High-Dimensional State-Space Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in Johansen (2015) and Guarniero et al (2017) the smoothing and filtering distributions (i.e. p(x 1:t |y 1:t ) and p(x t |y 1:t ), respectively) have significantly different support in the presence of informative observations, especially in high di-mensional settings and so we expect that including the influence of future observations in the proposals and targets in Section 3.2 (as in lookahead methods, e.g., Lin et al (2013); Guarniero et al (2017); Ruzayqat et al (2022)) would lead to considerable improvements in the accuracy of the estimates and might ultimately be essential in the development of good general purpose filters for high dimensional problems. This work focuses on obtaining approximations of the filtering distribution for high dimensional SSM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Johansen (2015) and Guarniero et al (2017) the smoothing and filtering distributions (i.e. p(x 1:t |y 1:t ) and p(x t |y 1:t ), respectively) have significantly different support in the presence of informative observations, especially in high di-mensional settings and so we expect that including the influence of future observations in the proposals and targets in Section 3.2 (as in lookahead methods, e.g., Lin et al (2013); Guarniero et al (2017); Ruzayqat et al (2022)) would lead to considerable improvements in the accuracy of the estimates and might ultimately be essential in the development of good general purpose filters for high dimensional problems. This work focuses on obtaining approximations of the filtering distribution for high dimensional SSM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative course of action is to aim for methods that aim to approximate 𝜋 k without using importance sampling and resampling for Π k and Equation (2). The method in Ruzayqat et al (2022), which was designed for high-dimensional filtering, has been our first attempt to perform filtering for this model. The method transports particles from a variant of Equation ( 2) that only considers the path between t k−L+1 to t k for a small lag L and thus bypasses the degeneracy issues by introducing a moderately low bias.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, simple or standard designs of PFs require an exponential cost in the dimension d to achieve a certain precision and hence are impractical for very high-dimensional applications. Several methods Beskos et al (2014aBeskos et al ( , 2014bBeskos et al ( , 2017; Kantas et al (2014);Pons Llopis et al (2018); Ruzayqat et al (2022) based on a combination of sequential Monte Carlo (SMC: e.g., Del Moral et al (2006);Del Moral (2013)) and MCMC can be adopted. For well-designated classes of models, they have been shown to be both mathematically and empirically able to deal with high-dimensional filtering, at a cost that is polynomial in the dimension of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally the main difficulty with particle filtering techniques has been the 'curse of dimensionality' (Bengtsson et al, 2008;Bickel et al, 2008;Snyder, 2011), where in high dimensional settings filtering leads to degeneracy of the importance weights associated with each particle and loss of diversity within an ensemble. To improve the applicability of PFs there have been many recent developments involving; localisation techniques (e.g., the reviews in Farchi and Bocquet (2018); Graham and Thiery (2019)), incorporation of tempering/mutation steps (e.g., Cotter et al (2020); Ruzayqat et al (2022)), hybrid approaches, improved computational implementations and combination of the above with improved proposal distributions. The above ongoing efforts have extended the applicability of PF methods within geoscientific domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%