Limnology and Aquatic Birds 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5556-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A landscape-scale model of yellow-billed loon (Gavia adamsii) habitat preferences in northern Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, loons that require large lakes for breeding and foraging [70] were most abundant in flat areas with high amounts of freshwater; gulls, which often breed on marshy hummocks, raised beaches, and inland tundra around large ponds [71], [72], were most abundant in the same habitats as loons. Shorebirds were most abundant in flat areas with high vegetative productivity, as predicted based on habitat preference [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, loons that require large lakes for breeding and foraging [70] were most abundant in flat areas with high amounts of freshwater; gulls, which often breed on marshy hummocks, raised beaches, and inland tundra around large ponds [71], [72], were most abundant in the same habitats as loons. Shorebirds were most abundant in flat areas with high vegetative productivity, as predicted based on habitat preference [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Square root of pond area is an approximation of available shoreline, whereas pond perimeter accounts for the intricacies of the shoreline but is more affected than pond area by the scale at which it is measured (Mandelbrot ). Shoreline complexity is the ratio of the measured perimeter of a water body to the circumference of a circle of equal area, with a perfectly circular water body having a shoreline complexity of 1 (Hansson et al , Earnst et al ). Along with a null model (an intercept‐only model), we considered all single‐factor models involving the explanatory variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%