2016
DOI: 10.1177/0276236616636216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Latent Growth Curve Analysis of Taking Conflict Personally as a Consequence of Sex, Conflict Initiation, Victimization, Conflict-Linkage, and Cardiovascular Reactivity

Abstract: This study examines reactions to others' conflict. We examined the effects of taking conflict personally (TCP), sex, conflict initiation (husband vs. wife initiation), and past victimization from domestic abuse on predicting conciliation in response to escalating aggression over four time periods. We examined both the prediction of escalation and imagined interaction conflict-linkage in terms of persons ruminating about the escalating disagreement as it unfolded as well as blood pressure and heart rate. Latent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: “personalized disagreements,” Guenter et al , 2016), circumstances and effects of conflict personalization ( N = 6, e.g. “climate,” Dallinger and Hample, 1995) or considered outliers that did not fit with any theme and were therefore not considered important (“self-fulfilling prophecy,” Simons and Peterson, 2000; “likes to engage in arguing while the other is a conflict avoider,” Honeycutt et al , 2016; “able to respect,” Sung Eun Chung and Meneely, 2012). Afterwards, each text fragment that was not coded as “other” was read again and assigned to one or more of the five themes to generate a thematic map of the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: “personalized disagreements,” Guenter et al , 2016), circumstances and effects of conflict personalization ( N = 6, e.g. “climate,” Dallinger and Hample, 1995) or considered outliers that did not fit with any theme and were therefore not considered important (“self-fulfilling prophecy,” Simons and Peterson, 2000; “likes to engage in arguing while the other is a conflict avoider,” Honeycutt et al , 2016; “able to respect,” Sung Eun Chung and Meneely, 2012). Afterwards, each text fragment that was not coded as “other” was read again and assigned to one or more of the five themes to generate a thematic map of the data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most conflictual encounters trigger tension and anxiety initially (Larkin, Frazer, and Semenchuk 1996), which, in turn, makes us more inclined to perceive or instigate conflict (Etkin et al 2010). When lingering, this state can stress our relationships, lower our self‐esteem (Ozdemir 2014), and increase our blood pressure (Honeycutt, Hample, and Hatcher 2016), thereby making us feel even more anxious and disagreeable.…”
Section: Conflict Anxiety Response Scale: the Origin Storymentioning
confidence: 99%