A layered naming architecture for the internet

Balakrishnan, Hari; Lakshminarayanan, Karthik; Ratnasamy, Sylvia; Shenker, Scott; Stoica, Ion; Walfish, Michael

doi:10.1145/1015467.1015505

Cited by 180 publications

(139 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

138

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gateway implementations can support many of these solutions, making it easy to communicate with hosts that do not have the necessary protocol extensions. [17], the Split Naming/Forwarding (SNF) architecture [18], the FARA architecture [20], the Layered Naming Architecture [19], IPNL [24], 8+8 [25], TRIAD [26] and Plutarch [21], among others. Due to space limitations, this paper can only briefly compare these systems to the node ID architecture.…”

Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture

Ahlgren

Arkko

Eggert³

et al. 2006

Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-The Internet consists of independent networks that belong to different administrative domains and vary in scope from personal area networks, private home networks, corporate networks to ISP and global operator networks. These networks may employ different technologies, communications mediums, addressing realms and may have widely different capabilities. The coming years will add a significant level of dynamic behavior, such as mobile nodes and moving networks, which the Internet must support. At the same time, there is a need to address the increasing levels of harmful traffic and denial-of-service attacks. The existing Internet architecture does not support dynamic behavior or secure communication to a sufficient degree. This paper outlines a node-identity-based internetworking architecture that allows heterogeneous networks to work together without loss of functionality. Some of techniques employed in this architecture include reliance on cryptographic node identifiers, identity routers and localized addressing realms. 1

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture

Ahlgren

Arkko

Eggert³

et al. 2006

Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our system differs from SFR in two important ways: our use of semantic-aware names, and hierarchical indexing networks, which results into a more commercially applicable system. In [13], the authors advocate a layered naming architecture for the future Internet. Intentional Naming System (INS) [14] is another hierarchical naming protocol.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A hierarchical naming system for scalable content distribution in large networks

Zhao

Liu

et al. 2013

2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The Internet has become a platform for delivering and consuming content. Additionally, mobile devices consume a significant chunk of content, which poses a unique challenge for provisioning efficient content delivery and is not addressed in contemporary infrastructures. In this paper, we present a naming system that provides Internet-scale content distribution service with a particular emphasis on content delivery across mobile devices. The basis of the system is a highly flexible and expressive content naming scheme. It is flexible in expressing diverse application requirements. To achieve fast name resolution, we design a two-level indexing network using Distributed Hash Table (DHT). This architecture is open and scalable. It utilizes a key-value storage system built on DHT. Our content delivery protocol relies on content routers to balance the load of delivering content and to throttle denial-of-service attacks. The feasibility of the system is analyzed based on a realistic modeling of the Internet. Simulation studies are performed to verify its usefulness and performance.

show abstract

“…For example, both i3 and DOA [5] use DHTs for either forwarding or lookup. RON (an overlay that provides resilient routing) and OverQoS [39] (an overlay that provides quality-ofservice routing) heavily depend on measurements of underlying network performance characteristics such as latency and bandwidth.…”

Section: Control Plane Compositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

MOSAIC: Declarative platform for dynamic overlay composition

Mao¹,

Loo²,

Smith³

2012

Computer Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Overlay networks create new networking services using nodes that communicate using pre-existing networks. They are often optimized for specific applications and targeted at niche vertical domains, but lack interoperability with which their functionalities can be shared. MOSAIC is a declarative platform for constructing new overlay networks from multiple existing overlays, each possessing a subset of the desired new network's characteristics.This paper focuses on the design and implementation of MOSAIC: composition and deployment of control and/or data plane functions of different overlay networks, dynamic compositions of overlay networks to meet changing application needs and network conditions, and seamless support for legacy applications. MOSAIC overlays are specified using Mozlog, a new declarative language for expressing overlay properties independently from their particular implementation or underlying network.MOSAIC is validated experimentally using compositions specified in Mozlog in order to create new overlay networks with compositions of their functions: the i3 indirection overlay that supports mobility, the resilient overlay network (RON) overlay for robust routing, and the Chord distributed hash table for scalable lookups. MO-SAIC uses runtime composition to simultaneously deliver application-aware mobility, NAT traversal and reliability. We further demonstrate MOSAIC's dynamic composition capabilities by Chord switching its underlay from IP to RON at runtime.MOSAIC's benefits are obtained at a low performance cost, as demonstrated by measurements on both a local cluster environment and the PlanetLab global testbed.

show abstract

A layered naming architecture for the internet

Cited by 180 publications

References 28 publications

A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture

A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture

A hierarchical naming system for scalable content distribution in large networks

MOSAIC: Declarative platform for dynamic overlay composition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About