2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32541-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lazy Man’s Way to Part-of-Speech Tagging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tagging accuracy for using a words' starting information is 39.02% on the third iteration as compared to using a words' ending information, which is 38.36% on the fourth iteration.The difference of 0.66% reflects about 105 tokens (out of 15,882). This finding strengthens the argument to use words' starting information for character-based prediction of unknown words' POS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tagging accuracy for using a words' starting information is 39.02% on the third iteration as compared to using a words' ending information, which is 38.36% on the fourth iteration.The difference of 0.66% reflects about 105 tokens (out of 15,882). This finding strengthens the argument to use words' starting information for character-based prediction of unknown words' POS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimation is recursively calculated by considering the marginal distribution of tags ( ) produced by HMM training, formulated in Equation (2) and the standard division in Equation (15) to every successive character.…”
Section: Predicting Pos Through a Words Startingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A module to fi lter unwanted names, those with low confi dence, so as to increase the tagger's performance rate has been integrated to the framework.  How the hybrid approach handles the projection of linguistic tags for both POS tagging (Zamin et al, 2012a;Zamin et al, 2012b) and NER tagging at a fairly accurate rate have been successfully demonstrated.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 3 shows an example of bigram pair-wise matching for the word 'the' against the lexemes 'unbelievable' and 'unreliable.' The technical details of this algorithm are given by Zamin, Oxley, Abu Bakar & Farhan (2012b) with worked examples. All the proper names appearing in the corpus are also stored as they are in our lexicon.…”
Section: Word Alignermentioning
confidence: 99%