2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-022-01292-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lightweight convolutional neural network for pose estimation of a planar model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction outcomes are analyzed using the metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score [43][44][45][46]. The accuracy indicator displays the rate of model prediction accuracy across all parameters.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction outcomes are analyzed using the metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score [43][44][45][46]. The accuracy indicator displays the rate of model prediction accuracy across all parameters.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors proposed a novel ground vibration monitoring strategy for MEMS-sensed data using a deep learning approach [44]. The following study created a network for magnitude estimation using convolutional and recurrent layers [45]. In subsequent research, ConvNetQuake was developed to identify nearby micro-earthquakes based on signal waveforms.…”
Section: B Deep Learning In Earthquake Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Merzić et al [39] used definition (18) in an algorithm for visual localization and found it valid and efficient to use, whereas Brégier et al [40] found reasonable the proposed u choice, and Chen et al [41] used it to build their own metric definition. Then, Kendall et al [42] and, recently, Ocegueda-Hernández et al [43] used definition (18) by choosing two different metrics for SO (3) and found it efficient to compute the pose error when estimating the position and orientation of a three-dimensional object from its projection onto a two-dimensional image. It is worth noting that the above-proposed direct deduction of the u value immediately solves the problem of choosing a suitable scaling factor together with the limitations highlighted by Rico-Martinez and Duffy [3] for finite rigid bodies.…”
Section: Applicative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%