2006
DOI: 10.1121/1.2200139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A linearized Euler finite-difference time-domain sound propagation model with terrain-following coordinates

Abstract: The equations of a linearized Euler finite-difference time-domain model for sound propagation through an inhomogeneous and moving atmosphere above absorbing ground are adapted to terrain-following coordinates. With the transformed numerical grid the effect of gentle orography is fully considered and the shortcomings of the representation of the orography by blocked-out grid cells in an untransformed grid are avoided. Comparisons with an analytical method to predict the interference patterns of a monochromic so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This choice was justified in view of the reduction in computing time by a factor 8 when using the coarser grid. Surface-following coordinates [11] or curvilinear FDTD grids [12] could be an alternative.…”
Section: Finite Differences Time Domain Modelling Of the Acoustic Scamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice was justified in view of the reduction in computing time by a factor 8 when using the coarser grid. Surface-following coordinates [11] or curvilinear FDTD grids [12] could be an alternative.…”
Section: Finite Differences Time Domain Modelling Of the Acoustic Scamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of high variations of the terrain or of the medium properties, however, the parabolic approximation in PE is not valid. In recent years, FDTD [14][15][16] models have drawn substantial interest due to their ability to handle complex topography, meteorology and complicated phenomena such as scattering from buildings and trees or dynamic turbulence fields. The treatment of finite ground impedance and the timeconsuming calculations-in order to get accurate resultsare the main drawbacks of these models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Elevate the DSM points to their heights. (5) Elevate the boundary and building outline segments by extrapolation of the heights of the DSM points extracted in step (1). The extrapolation technique is explained in Sect.…”
Section: Reconstruction Of the Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study was conceptual in that the frequency target of the simulation was as low as approximately 30 Hz owing to the use of a finite-difference grid of 1 m spacing forced by the limitation of the technique. Specifically, the applicability of the geometry reconstruction technique was limited by the following points: (1) The technique performs staircasing of the original building geometry with alignment to a grid system of hard-coded 1 m spacing. The staircasing prohibits accurate reproduction of the original geometry, especially required for high-frequency simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation