2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013962118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A link between synaptic plasticity and reorganization of brain activity in Parkinson's disease

Abstract: The link between synaptic plasticity and reorganization of brain activity in health and disease remains a scientific challenge. We examined this question in Parkinson’s disease (PD) where functional up-regulation of postsynaptic D2 receptors has been documented while its significance at the neural activity level has never been identified. We investigated cortico-subcortical plasticity in PD using the oculomotor system as a model to study reorganization of dopaminergic networks. This model is ideal because this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cortical-subcortical circuitry includes different deep nuclei and brainstem regions, segregated in direct and indirect pathways (between others, the pulvinar thalami, intralaminar nuclei, mesopontine tegmentum, basal forebrain, globus pallidus, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, and caudate nucleus) (LaBerge 1995; Kinomura et al 1996). More recently, a functional imbalance (hypo-vs. hyper-activation) between the functional connectivity of certain cortical territories of the fronto-parietal network involved in oculomotor control (notably, the frontal and parietal eyes elds) and the striatal structures (putamen and caudate) was demonstrated as a pathological substrate in Parkinson Disease (Rebelo et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cortical-subcortical circuitry includes different deep nuclei and brainstem regions, segregated in direct and indirect pathways (between others, the pulvinar thalami, intralaminar nuclei, mesopontine tegmentum, basal forebrain, globus pallidus, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, and caudate nucleus) (LaBerge 1995; Kinomura et al 1996). More recently, a functional imbalance (hypo-vs. hyper-activation) between the functional connectivity of certain cortical territories of the fronto-parietal network involved in oculomotor control (notably, the frontal and parietal eyes elds) and the striatal structures (putamen and caudate) was demonstrated as a pathological substrate in Parkinson Disease (Rebelo et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased FC within CTC possibly played a compensating role for long‐term dopaminergic denervation, which was characterized by enhanced bursting and oscillatory neural activity (Blesa et al, 2017 ; Sen et al, 2010 ). Such aberrant neural activity was triggered by synaptic changes to offset chronic dopaminergic depletion, including upregulation of dopamine synthesis and release, downregulation of dopamine transporter, and increased receptor expression (Blesa et al, 2017 ; Rebelo et al, 2021 ). This increased connectome was normalized under long‐term DRT but not after the levodopa challenge test, which demonstrated CTC restoration was based on long‐term and repeated dopaminergic medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ROI-based quantitative analysis of [ 11 C]raclopride images was implemented in the PET images native space using an in-house made software used previously in other PET studies [30]. In this [ 11 C]raclopride PET study, the reversible tracer binding to D2/D3 receptor was quantified by the distribution volume ratio (DVR) model parameter [31].…”
Section: Data Pre-processing and Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No previous machine learning molecular imaging approaches have used kinetic parameters obtained from dynamic [ 11 C]raclopride PET data, although the dopaminergic system has been studied in this context using other tracers. Recently, Oliveira et al (2021) applied the quantitative analysis of [ 123 I]ioflupane SPECT data to differentiate healthy CTRL from DLB and PD [21]. Segovia et al used [ 18 F]DMFP PET to quantify postsynaptic D2/D3 striatal dopamine receptors and designed SVM classifiers to distinguish between PD, MSA and PSP patients [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%