1998
DOI: 10.1080/026432998381212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Literature Review and New Data Supporting an Interactive Account of Letter-by-Letter Reading

Abstract: We present a theoretical account of letter-by-letter reading (LBL) that reconciles discrepant findings associated with this form of acquired dyslexia. We claim that LBL reading is caused by a deficit that affects the normal activation of the orthographic representation of the stimulus. In spite of this lower-level deficit, the degraded orthographic information may be processed further, and lexical, semantic, and higher-order orthographic information may still influence the reading patterns of these patients. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
76
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
9
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to model a peripheral deficit in letter perception of the sort postulated by Behrmann, Plaut, and Nelson (1998) to produce LBL reading, input letter activations were corrupted by Gaussian noise (SD ϭ .055). When this was done, correct performance dropped from 99.3% to 90.0% correct (averaged across 10 runs through the training corpus).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to model a peripheral deficit in letter perception of the sort postulated by Behrmann, Plaut, and Nelson (1998) to produce LBL reading, input letter activations were corrupted by Gaussian noise (SD ϭ .055). When this was done, correct performance dropped from 99.3% to 90.0% correct (averaged across 10 runs through the training corpus).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, impaired identification of even single letters is common in pure alexia, ranging in severity from complete global alexia to the occurrence of occasional errors with a significant slowing down of letter naming (for a review, see Behrmann et al, 1998b;e.g. Hanley and Kay, 1996).…”
Section: Pure Alexia and Regional Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, they show a word length effect in oral word reading. Pure alexia might result from different functional deficits [48], but an impairment of visual letter identification has been repeatedly underlined [1,4,11,47] (see [10] for review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%