2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A LOFAR census of non-recycled pulsars: average profiles, dispersion measures, flux densities, and spectra

Abstract: We present first results from a LOFAR census of non-recycled pulsars. The census includes almost all such pulsars known (194 sources) at declinations Dec > 8• and Galactic latitudes |Gb| > 3• , regardless of their expected flux densities and scattering times. Each pulsar was observed for ≥20 min in the contiguous frequency range of 110-188 MHz. Full-Stokes data were recorded. We present the dispersion measures, flux densities, and calibrated total intensity profiles for the 158 pulsars detected in the sample. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
170
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
22
170
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent works showing average pulse profiles in the LO-FAR bands confirm the expectation of scatter broadened pulse shapes at these frequencies (Bilous et al 2015;Pilia et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Recent works showing average pulse profiles in the LO-FAR bands confirm the expectation of scatter broadened pulse shapes at these frequencies (Bilous et al 2015;Pilia et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This is another of the original four pulsars discovered at Cambridge (Pilkington et al 1968) that has a classic two-component profile and has been studied at many different frequencies. At low radio frequencies, the two components are of comparable amplitude (Bilous et al 2016) but, as Fig. 1 shows, at 8.6 GHz, the trailing component is much weaker, indicating a much steeper spectrum.…”
Section: Psr J1136+1551 (B1133+16)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…error on system parameters, beam jitter due to the propagation in the ionosphere or strong sources contributing through the side lobes of the beam. Detailed discussion on error calculation is provided by Bilous et al (2015).…”
Section: Spectral Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%