2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00291-008-0162-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A log-robust optimization approach to portfolio management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quaranta and Zaffaroni [43] present a similar model, based on ''box'' uncertainty sets for the expected returns, and study its performance in the Italian market. Kawas and Thiele [44] introduce a single-period logrobust portfolio optimization approach, in which uncertainty sets are considered for the continuously compounded rates of return.…”
Section: Robust Formulations Of Classical Portfolio Allocation Framewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quaranta and Zaffaroni [43] present a similar model, based on ''box'' uncertainty sets for the expected returns, and study its performance in the Italian market. Kawas and Thiele [44] introduce a single-period logrobust portfolio optimization approach, in which uncertainty sets are considered for the continuously compounded rates of return.…”
Section: Robust Formulations Of Classical Portfolio Allocation Framewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Ben-Tal et al [17] studied and compared various robust optimization problems according to the theory of convex risk measure, which shows that different robustness settings can result in different performances. Kawas and Thiele [18] developed a log robust portfolio model to consider the heavytailed property of stock prices. However, these discussed literatures comparing a robust method with a nominal one are based on only one-time period analysis, in-sample analysis or simulation experiments which might mislead comparison result of two methods.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now an extensive volume of methods and applications available for portfolio optimization (e.g., Ehrgott et al 2004;Mulvey 2004;Boyle et al 2008;Anagnostopoulos and Mamanis 2010;Oliveira et al 2011;Mansini et al 2014;Bekiros et al 2015;Tofighian et al 2018). While some of the existing methods include robustness in the portfolio optimization framework (e.g., Kawas and Thiele 2008;DeMiguel and Nogales 2009;Delage and Ye 2010;Chen et al 2011;Zymler et al 2011), most of the existing methods for portfolio optimization can deal with only aleatory uncertainty. A few methods exist that deal with both aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%