A lógica interna das lutas corporais: implicações iniciais para o ensino-aprendizagem-treinamento do brazilian jiu-jítsu

Abstract

Visto somente como um meio de proteção e autodefesa, o Brazilian Jiu-jítsu passou a integrar diferentes materiais pedagógicos referentes a Educação Física. Entretanto, seu processo de ensino-aprendizagem-treinamento tem pouca fundamentação teórica. Nessa perspectiva, a presente pesquisa tem como objetivo refletir a respeito da Lógica Interna de interação do Brazilian Jiu-jítsu, sob as lentes da Praxiologia Motriz, a fim de apresentar suas contribuições para o processo de ensino-aprendizagem-treinamento. Para isso, foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica, de cunho exploratório, com o intuito compreender a lógica sociomotriz de oposição e as comunicações práxicas pertinentes a essa prática corporal, possibilitando ao professor novas possibilidades para o ensino desta.

Identification and description of the sociomotor sub-roles and the Ludogram of Brazilian jiu-jitsu

“…The results of this research regarding the identification and description of the BJJ sub-roles corroborate and expand the analyses by Schmidt and Ribas ( 5 ), who pointed out that this is a body combat sport practiced in a stable environment with oppositional sociomotor interaction; a duel between two individuals with a target-space objective of the motor interactions in the opponent's body with motor interactions pertinent to practices classified in the almost zero guard distance (gloveless combatants, with permanent contact between the fighters that authorize and codify the combat on the ground, and with one of the objectives being to knock down the opponent).…”

“…Regarding the general aspects of the internal logic of BJJ, a preliminary study carried out by Schmidt and Ribas ( 5 ) revealed that, according to praxeological analyses, this corporal fighting style, conceived as a praxeological system, is characterized as: a sociomotor practice of opposition; unrolled in a stable environment; a duel between two individuals situated at almost null guard distance, with motor interactions directed at the opponent's body (joint locks, strangulations, falls, projections, imbalances, immobilizations, etc. ); in addition, both participants assume the same sociomotor role, that is, they have the same rights, obligations, and restrictions regarding motor interactions.…”

“…But, due to the fact that the responsibility for victory or defeat always falls to one of the participating fighters, BJJ has been mistakenly conceived as a motor practice of individual action. However, characterizing it as a psychomotor or individual action sport refers to organizing didactic situations in an internal logic different from their needs for direct and indirect practical communication ( 5 ). The authors conclude that motor counter-communication interactions require participants to develop the competence to read and interpret the opponent's body messages.…”

“…Considering the pedagogical aspects, Schmidt and Ribas ( 5 ) defended the need for further praxeological studies of BJJ to unveil its praxeological system. The production of this scientific knowledge is sought to overcome the superficial understanding regarding the structures and dynamics of motor practices.…”