2000
DOI: 10.1002/cbm.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of adolescent and adult conviction rates among children referred to psychiatric services for behavioural or emotional problems

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all analyses, measures of childhood psychiatric status (cumulative prevalence rate prior to age 16) preceded those of young adult criminal status (ages [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Prospective associations between childhood psychiatric disorder status and young adult criminality were analyzed first.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In all analyses, measures of childhood psychiatric status (cumulative prevalence rate prior to age 16) preceded those of young adult criminal status (ages [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Prospective associations between childhood psychiatric disorder status and young adult criminality were analyzed first.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No between-groups differences in ethnicity were observed between whites and American Indians (minor offenses: odds ratio=0.8, 95% CI= 0.5-1.1; moderate offenses: odds ratio=0.7, 95% CI=0.4-1.1; severe/violent offenses: odds ratio=0.8, 95% CI=0.4-1.3). Figure 1 compares the prevalences of overall childhood diagnoses among those with no arrests, those with arrests in young adulthood (ages [16][17][18][19][20][21] only, and those with arrests as juveniles (through age 15) and in young adulthood. Cumulative rates of DSM-IV disorders for children (through age 16) with no young adult offenses were 33.6% (SE=3.7) for boys and 26.3% (SE=3.0) for girls, compared with rates of 51.4% (SE=4.6) for male offenders and 43.6% (SE=6.9) for female offenders (male offenders: odds ratio= 2.2, 95% CI=1.1-4.1; female offenders: odds ratio=2.1, 95% CI=1.3-3.4).…”
Section: Descriptive Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations