2010
DOI: 10.1080/00036840701564426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lottery within a lottery? An examination of the distribution of lottery funds in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feehan and Forrest (2007) and Stranahan and Borg (2004) find that wealthy individuals and regions tend to benefit disproportionally from money earmarked towards cultural programs and education, potentially exacerbating the regressivity of the revenue side of lotteries. Gripaios, Bishop and Brand (2010) and Campbell and Finney (2005) note that inequalities in the distribution of lottery proceeds are not limited to income levels but also apply to geography and race, although both studies suggest that inequalities in lotteries on the expenditure side are either non-existent or at least less severe than inequalities on the revenue side.…”
Section: Public Finance: Incidence Equity and Externalities Of Lottmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feehan and Forrest (2007) and Stranahan and Borg (2004) find that wealthy individuals and regions tend to benefit disproportionally from money earmarked towards cultural programs and education, potentially exacerbating the regressivity of the revenue side of lotteries. Gripaios, Bishop and Brand (2010) and Campbell and Finney (2005) note that inequalities in the distribution of lottery proceeds are not limited to income levels but also apply to geography and race, although both studies suggest that inequalities in lotteries on the expenditure side are either non-existent or at least less severe than inequalities on the revenue side.…”
Section: Public Finance: Incidence Equity and Externalities Of Lottmentioning
confidence: 99%