2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2020.3022714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low Walk Error Analog Front-End Circuit With Intensity Compensation for Direct ToF LiDAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The noise of the receiver (without the contribution of the APD dark current or signal shot noise) was around ~3nArms, with a relatively high input capacitance, estimated at ~3.5pF. This noise level was much lower than those typically achieved with recently published laser radar receivers [15,16,17,18,25]. It was also shown by using the designed receiver in a pulsed TOF laser radar configuration that it allows single shot measurements of distances to non-cooperative targets over a range of several hundred metres with a modest laser power of 4W and a receiver aperture of 20mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The noise of the receiver (without the contribution of the APD dark current or signal shot noise) was around ~3nArms, with a relatively high input capacitance, estimated at ~3.5pF. This noise level was much lower than those typically achieved with recently published laser radar receivers [15,16,17,18,25]. It was also shown by using the designed receiver in a pulsed TOF laser radar configuration that it allows single shot measurements of distances to non-cooperative targets over a range of several hundred metres with a modest laser power of 4W and a receiver aperture of 20mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This means that the input-referred equivalent rms current noise of the receiver should be only a few nanoamperes, in order to achieve the SNR of 5…10 which is needed for reliable single shot detection of the laser pulse echo. This is a markedly lower value than is typically available in wide-band receivers (50…100nArms, as in [15,17,25], for example), and thus optimization of the receiver with respect to noise is needed [26].…”
Section: A the Signal-to-noise Ratio In Laser Rangingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it could not avoid the increase of cost and form factor. References [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] exploited off-chip APDs, which resulted in hardware complexity in an array configuration of multi-channel receivers.…”
Section: Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%