1982
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0012780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lower bound for the formula size of rational functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kalorkoti proved an Ω(n 3 ) lower bound on the formula-size of determinant [Kal85]. His argument can be thought of as the algebraic analog of Nechiporuk's argument (for the Boolean setting), that gives a lower bound on the Boolean formula size of a Boolean function f by counting the number of different sub-functions of f .…”
Section: Sketchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kalorkoti proved an Ω(n 3 ) lower bound on the formula-size of determinant [Kal85]. His argument can be thought of as the algebraic analog of Nechiporuk's argument (for the Boolean setting), that gives a lower bound on the Boolean formula size of a Boolean function f by counting the number of different sub-functions of f .…”
Section: Sketchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we explain Strassen's degree bound that gives a super-linear lower bound for general circuits [Str73b] and Kalorkoti's quadratic lower bound on the size of general formulas [Kal85]. We discuss the lower bounds for the size of bounded depth circuits [SS91,Raz08].…”
Section: Lower Bounds For Arithmetic Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the conjectured lower bound for formulas computing Det n is superpoly(n), the best known lower bound for the same is (n 3 ) (Kalorkoti, 1985). (A slightly better (N 2 ) bound is known for formulas computing an N-variate VNP-polynomial) 1 .…”
Section: Some Known Formula Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, there is no known tool for obtaining a non-trivial lower bound for the circuit size of the permanent. The only known non-trivial lower bound for the formula size of the permanent is due to Kalorkoti [7], which says that over any field, the formula size of P er n (F) is at least Ω(n 3 ). (Kalorkoti proved the same lower bound for the formula size of the determinant, and Pavel Hrubeš told me that Kalorkoti's proof works also for the formula size of the permanent.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%