2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning approach to product review disambiguation based on function, form and behavior classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, many researchers examine customer preferences and needs from online product reviews because they describe customer preferences and complaints about a specific product from the users' point of view and thus provide a good channel for informing purchase decisions, customer needs analysis, and product redesign and improvement. For example, Singh and Tucker [28] proposed a machine learning algorithm to predict product function, form, and behavior from online product review data, and they also found that the form of a product was highly correlated with its star rating. In order to mitigate online product rating biases, Lim and Tucker [29] examined reviewers' rating histories and tendencies with an unsupervised model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many researchers examine customer preferences and needs from online product reviews because they describe customer preferences and complaints about a specific product from the users' point of view and thus provide a good channel for informing purchase decisions, customer needs analysis, and product redesign and improvement. For example, Singh and Tucker [28] proposed a machine learning algorithm to predict product function, form, and behavior from online product review data, and they also found that the form of a product was highly correlated with its star rating. In order to mitigate online product rating biases, Lim and Tucker [29] examined reviewers' rating histories and tendencies with an unsupervised model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh and Tucker follow up on this work by investigating different machine learning models to classify reviews based on the content of the review using precision, recall, and F-scores to evaluate the model [16]. The authors manually annotated reviews to one of the following categories: function, form, behavior, service, and other content.…”
Section: Extracting Explicit Customer Perceptions Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimizing the words during the text pre-processing phase as much as possible is very important to group similar features and obtain a better prediction. As mentioned in [15], the authors suggest processing the text through stemming and lower casing of words to reduce inflectional forms and derivational affixes from the text. The Porter Stemming algorithm is used to map variations of words (e.g., run, running and runner) into a common root term (e.g., run).…”
Section: B Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%