2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1059597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning–Based model to predict early death among bone metastatic breast cancer patients: A large cohort of 16,189 patients

Abstract: Purpose: This study aims to develop a prediction model to categorize the risk of early death among breast cancer patients with bone metastases using machine learning models.Methods: This study examined 16,189 bone metastatic breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2019 from a large oncological database in the United States. The patients were divided into two groups at random in a 90:10 ratio. The majority of patients (n = 14,582, 90%) were served as the training group to train and optimize prediction models, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 and Table IV show that the performance of each model was successful in cancer prediction accuracy. These results showed superiority in the same ML models in [24] and [26] where the Bagging and K-NN models achieved a performance of 96.47% and 96.40% in predicting Breast Cancer. These results do not determine that one is better than the other, on the contrary, the performance rate varies according to different factors, and one of them is the volume of data with which it is trained.…”
Section: J Model Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 and Table IV show that the performance of each model was successful in cancer prediction accuracy. These results showed superiority in the same ML models in [24] and [26] where the Bagging and K-NN models achieved a performance of 96.47% and 96.40% in predicting Breast Cancer. These results do not determine that one is better than the other, on the contrary, the performance rate varies according to different factors, and one of them is the volume of data with which it is trained.…”
Section: J Model Training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For this, they used three parameters such as age, cell type with cancer, and cell interface receptors. Also, in [24] developed a predictive model to categorize people with breast cancer using the logistic regression (LR) model, GB model, decision tree (DT), and RF model. Obtaining the following results for the LR model 81.9%; GBT with 82%; RF with 82.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies, including (Kong et al, 2020 ; Jo et al, 2021 ; Wu et al, 2021 ; Xiong et al, 2022 ), have shown that the GB classifier outperforms other algorithms in predicting PLoS, with reported accuracy, AUC, and Brier score ranging from 75.3 to 82.9%, 0.74 to 0.873, and 0.122 to 0.156, respectively. Our study's findings are consistent with these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have explored early death in breast cancer patients, but there are no studies on early death in breast cancer patients with liver metastases. [11][12][13] This study aims to address this gap by exploring prognostic factors and constructing a columnar plot to identify early death in breast cancer patients with liver metastases. This represents the first such study to our knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%