2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sengupta et al created a model which can provide the same amount of information about aortic stenosis severity as if both echocardiography and cardiac CT/MR were performed using only echocardiography and the model. Such solutions can be widely implemented in less-developed areas where sophisticated diagnostic methods are not available [ 62 ]. Another field that represents great potential is predicting pathology from seemingly physiological findings; for instance, there are successful attempts to identify patients with a history of atrial fibrillation from the ECG performed during the sinus rhythm [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sengupta et al created a model which can provide the same amount of information about aortic stenosis severity as if both echocardiography and cardiac CT/MR were performed using only echocardiography and the model. Such solutions can be widely implemented in less-developed areas where sophisticated diagnostic methods are not available [ 62 ]. Another field that represents great potential is predicting pathology from seemingly physiological findings; for instance, there are successful attempts to identify patients with a history of atrial fibrillation from the ECG performed during the sinus rhythm [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This superior stratification supports the use of changes in LV and AV function along a continuum in disease management. In Sengupta et al, 41 the investigators sought to identify a high-risk group among a cohort of 1052 patients with mild or moderate AS and a discordant AS group which is the traditional low-flow, low-gradient group. Topological data analysis based on echocardiographic parameters derived a high-risk type which had higher AV calcium scores, more late gadolinium enhancement, higher brain natriuretic protein and troponin levels, greater incidences of AVR, and death before and after AVR.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sengupta et al utilized a supervised ML model to augment echocardiographic stratification of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. They showed high-severity and low-severity AS phenotypes which were compared to markers of disease severity in CT and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and major clinical outcomes such as aortic valve replacement (AVR) and mortality [ 20 ]. Close to 70% of the 1964 patients were classified as having non-severe or discordant AS, but the ML model showed 1117 (57%) patients having high-severity AS and 847 (43%) patients having low-severity AS.…”
Section: Application Of ML In Cardiovascular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-severity groups had a higher incidence of elevated calcium scores and left ventricular fibrosis. In relation to current classification approaches, ML-derived classification had enhanced discrimination (integrated discrimination improvement 0.17, CI 0.02–0.12) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement 0.17, CI 0.11–0.23) for aortic valve replacement (AVR) outcomes at 5 years [ 20 ]. Current recommendations for evaluating AS are hindered by diagnostic ambiguity as many complications in AS arise secondary to valvular obstruction and ventricular decompensation [ 21 ].…”
Section: Application Of ML In Cardiovascular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%