2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A macroscopic violation of no-signaling in time inequalities? How to test temporal entanglement with behavioral observables

Abstract: In this paper we applied for the first time the no-signaling in time (NSIT) formalism discussed by Kofler and Brukner (2013) to investigate temporal entanglement between binary human behavioral unconscious choices at t1 with binary random outcomes at t2. NSIT consists of a set of inequalities and represents mathematical conditions for macro-realism which require only two measurements in time. The analyses of three independent experiments show a strong violation of NSIT in two out of three of them, suggesting t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with one of the most shared theoretical accounts, our results may be explained in the theoretical framework of the Predictive Anticipatory Activity (PAA) of Mossbridge et al (2014). The underlying assumption of this kind of empirical evidence maintains that PAA might be thought of as an unconscious anticipation of a conscious future events, suggesting the possibility of quantum-like temporal entanglement effects in human physiological processes (Hameroff et al, 2012;Fisher, 2015;Jedlicka, 2017;Tressoldi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In line with one of the most shared theoretical accounts, our results may be explained in the theoretical framework of the Predictive Anticipatory Activity (PAA) of Mossbridge et al (2014). The underlying assumption of this kind of empirical evidence maintains that PAA might be thought of as an unconscious anticipation of a conscious future events, suggesting the possibility of quantum-like temporal entanglement effects in human physiological processes (Hameroff et al, 2012;Fisher, 2015;Jedlicka, 2017;Tressoldi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The term retrocausal, refers to a condition in which the temporal causal links are inverted. Although there are, as yet, few experimental confirmations in psychology [40], in physics there is a vast literature about retrocausal effects in quantum mechanics [41,42]. The theoretical interpretation, reported here is a possible explanation of how the brain is capable of anticipating stimuli that are considered unpredictable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Both theories link unconscious processing to properties of quantum states and conscious moments to the process of measurement, including the establishment of local reality (note that GQT only applies the mathematical rules of quantum mechanics to these types of processes but makes no assumption about the exact physical nature of these processes). Within the unconscious realm, information processing follows quantum rules that involve superpositions [24], as well as spatial [25] and temporal non-locality [14,[26][27][28][29]. The latter could be explained by the hypothesis that the arrow of time may be bidirected at the quantum level and that the directed flow of time, from the past via the present to the future, only occurs in classical reality [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%