2019
DOI: 10.15196/ts590601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Magyarországon élő külföldi kötődésű népesség térbeli autokorreláltsága

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar analyses are also available for China [16,17] and Nigeria [40]. Similarly, spatial econometric approach is widely used for this kind of analysis [41,42]. The countries were selected based on the Eurostat database; only those countries where all data were available were considered.…”
Section: Data and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar analyses are also available for China [16,17] and Nigeria [40]. Similarly, spatial econometric approach is widely used for this kind of analysis [41,42]. The countries were selected based on the Eurostat database; only those countries where all data were available were considered.…”
Section: Data and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migration and the socio-economic aspects of Hungary's immigrant population have been the subject of a large set of Hungarian studies (most recently e.g. Cseh Papp, et al, 2018;Kincses & Tóth, 2019). Still, the ethnocentric immigrant population of the latest decades and its potential and quantifiablesupposedly greatimpacts have not been studied specifically.…”
Section: Hungary As a Field For Studying Ethnocentric Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tobler's (1970) first law of geography, according to which 'everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things', has been/is manifested in many socio-economic dimensions in the Hungarian context. Such regionalising phenomena in Hungary include, for example, different labour market characteristics (employability, unemployment, adult education), the level of education of the population, income status, health status, economic activities, entrepreneurial activity, socioeconomic development, or the population of foreign origin (Alpek-Tésits, 2019;Lőcsei, 2010;Hajdú & Koncz, 2022;Pénzes et al, 2018;Tóth & Nagy, 2013;Pénzes et al, 2014;Egri & Kőszegi, 2016;Egri, 2017;Szakálné Kanó, 2017;Jeneiné Gerő et al, 2021;Kincses & Tóth, 2019;Jakobi, 2018;Farkas & Kovács, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%