2005
DOI: 10.1002/int.20127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A majority model in group decision making using QMA-OWA operators

Abstract: Group decision-making problems are situations where a number of experts work in a decision process to obtain a final value that is representative of the global opinion. One of the main problems in this context is to design aggregation operators that take into account the individual opinions of the decision makers. One of the most important operators used for synthesizing the individual opinions in a representative value of majority in the OWA operator, where the majority concept used aggregation processes, is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common operators used in the aggregation process (Yager, 1993) overemphasize the opinion of the minority at the expense of those of the majority and create an aggregation that may be considered imprecise for the majority (Pelaez and Dona, 2006). In fact, classical aggregation processes all elements independently, but traditional majority primarily groups the elements by their similarities and then aggregating the groups (first and second part of Fig.…”
Section: Primary (Horizontal) Aggregation Level (Process 152)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common operators used in the aggregation process (Yager, 1993) overemphasize the opinion of the minority at the expense of those of the majority and create an aggregation that may be considered imprecise for the majority (Pelaez and Dona, 2006). In fact, classical aggregation processes all elements independently, but traditional majority primarily groups the elements by their similarities and then aggregating the groups (first and second part of Fig.…”
Section: Primary (Horizontal) Aggregation Level (Process 152)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the operator of quantified majority QMA-OWA [20] was selected in order to obtain a representative value of each arc. This operator obtains the final value as a result of an aggregation process of gradient variation approximations.…”
Section: Iris Location Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed approach relies on the analysis of gradient approximations on points of interest of successive arcs. It allows calculating the representative value on each successive arc as a result of the fusion of points of interest among the gradients points using the quantified majority operator QMA-OWA [20]. The identification of an Iris circular boundary in an image portion will be given by obtaining the arc with the greatest representative value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OWA [20,32,33,47,48] is primarily concerned with the problem of aggregating multicriteria to form an overall decision function. This approach is different from the classical weighted average in that coefficients are not associated directly with a particular attribute but rather to an ordered position.…”
Section: Fuzzy Ranking and Ordered Weighted Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%