2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2015.2427157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Majorize-Minimize Framework for Rician and Non-Central Chi MR Images

Abstract: The statistics of many MR magnitude images are described by the non-central chi (NCC) family of probability distributions, which includes the Rician distribution as a special case. These distributions have complicated negative log-likelihoods that are nontrivial to optimize. This paper describes a novel majorize-minimize framework for NCC data that allows penalized maximum likelihood estimates to be obtained by solving a series of much simpler regularized least-squares surrogate problems. The proposed framewor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(131 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data consistency constraint is used to enforce the fact that our estimated spectra should match the measured data reasonably well. We have measured data consistency using the 2‐norm to simplify the optimization algorithm, and while the 2‐norm implicitly assumes that the noise distribution is Gaussian (which, for magnitude images, is approximately valid at high SNR), it would be straightforward to more accurately model the Rician or non‐central chi signal distributions associated with low‐SNR magnitude images using the 2‐norm optimization strategy described in . The data consistency constraint also uses the scalars t i to avoid fitting multidimensional correlation spectra to noise‐only voxels of the image.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data consistency constraint is used to enforce the fact that our estimated spectra should match the measured data reasonably well. We have measured data consistency using the 2‐norm to simplify the optimization algorithm, and while the 2‐norm implicitly assumes that the noise distribution is Gaussian (which, for magnitude images, is approximately valid at high SNR), it would be straightforward to more accurately model the Rician or non‐central chi signal distributions associated with low‐SNR magnitude images using the 2‐norm optimization strategy described in . The data consistency constraint also uses the scalars t i to avoid fitting multidimensional correlation spectra to noise‐only voxels of the image.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of them reflects the underlying noise distribution of typical diffusion MR data, that is, Rician or noncentral chi distributions. Although algorithms capable of handling such distributions exist, namely PML methods , we did not include them in our analysis due to their practical limitations (eg, difficulties in precisely estimating the noise level of the data, nonconvexity of the cost function, or excessive computation times). Moreover, when comparing the results of the three algorithms used with genSD, we did not observe a significant change in bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that P Ω is still relevant to such cases. Specifically, we have recently introduced a quadratic majorize-minimize procedure [50] that allows Rician and noncentral chi log-likelihoods to be maximized by iteratively solving a sequence of NNLS problems, where each NNLS problem has the same form as P Ω . This type of approach is easily adapted to our proposed NNS greedy algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%