2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mammalian Organelle Map by Protein Correlation Profiling

Abstract: Protein localization to membrane-enclosed organelles is a central feature of cellular organization. Using protein correlation profiling, we have mapped 1,404 proteins to ten subcellular locations in mouse liver, and these correspond with enzymatic assays, marker protein profiles, and confocal microscopy. These localizations allowed assessment of the specificity in published organellar proteomic inventories and demonstrate multiple locations for 39% of all organellar proteins. Integration of proteomic and genom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
572
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 547 publications
(586 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
572
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of work previously published by us 38 and others, 51,52 we used subfractionation of cellular organelles by sucrose gradient centrifugation. The protein samples from nuclear (N) and mitochondrial (M) fractions of sucrose gradient subcellular fractionations of MCF7 cells were further fractionated by SDS gel electrophoresis or pI prior to trypsin treatment and MS analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of work previously published by us 38 and others, 51,52 we used subfractionation of cellular organelles by sucrose gradient centrifugation. The protein samples from nuclear (N) and mitochondrial (M) fractions of sucrose gradient subcellular fractionations of MCF7 cells were further fractionated by SDS gel electrophoresis or pI prior to trypsin treatment and MS analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our use of subfractionation of cellular organelles by sucrose gradient centrifugation is based on previous proteomics work indicating that fractionation of cytosol, plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi and mitochondria is readily obtained 22 and that with more sophisticated analysis of protein distribution along the gradient, as many as 10 subcellular locations can be distinguished. 23 The subsequent steps in identifying the proteins present in different fractions of the sucrose gradient (1D SDS gels, gel slicing, proteolytic production of peptides, and identification of peptides by MS) are standard proteomics techniques, and our use of them is described in detail in the Materials and Methods section. We note that the MUDPIT approach 15 has been used in connection with a fused silica C18 capillary column for elution and a nanoelectrospray ion source.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantages of this approach are that the degree of purification/ contamination of the organelle is difficult to ascertain conclusively for lower abundance proteins, that the protein content may be altered by the purification process and that the approach is not very suitable for dynamic studies of protein subcellular location. In a few cases, 22,23 an alternative approach of partial purification of organelles in a sucrose gradient has been employed, but the assignment of proteins to individual organelles has been based on matching gradient profiles of proteins to the profiles of presumptive marker proteins. This is useful for identifying what might be denominated core proteins of an organelle, but is automatically biased against evaluation of proteins in multiple subcellular locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have utilized label-free quantitative proteomics in the high throughput assignment of proteins to subcellular compartments. In one approach, protein correlation profiling, proteins from enriched organelle fractions are quantified by peptide ion intensity measurements (3,4). Other similar methods employ quantitation by spectral counting, recording the number of ions detected per protein (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%