2012
DOI: 10.1038/nature11142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution

Abstract: The exact positions of nucleosomes along genomic DNA can influence many aspects of chromosome function, yet existing methods for mapping nucleosomes do not provide the necessary single base pair accuracy to determine these positions. Here we develop and apply a new approach for direct mapping of nucleosome centers based on chemical modification of engineered histones. The resulting map locates nucleosome positions genome-wide in unprecedented detail and accuracy. It reveals novel aspects of the in vivo nucleos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

44
693
3
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(745 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
44
693
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the MAC and MIC results, we dissected relative contributions of cisdeterminants and trans-determinants to nucleosome distribution (manuscript under review). Tetrahymena is one of the few model systems in which histone mutagenesis can be readily performed (Liu et al, 2004), allowing complete replacement of endogenous histones with mutated ones needed for Cu + chelation, hydroxyl radical production, and subsequent cleavage of nucleosomal DNA around the dyad (Brogaard et al, 2012a). DNA fragments corresponding to ~200 bp NRL was generated by chemical cleavage, establishing it as a valid alternative for mapping nucleosome distribution in Tetrahymena ( Figure 6).…”
Section: General Approaches For Mapping Nucleosome Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By comparing the MAC and MIC results, we dissected relative contributions of cisdeterminants and trans-determinants to nucleosome distribution (manuscript under review). Tetrahymena is one of the few model systems in which histone mutagenesis can be readily performed (Liu et al, 2004), allowing complete replacement of endogenous histones with mutated ones needed for Cu + chelation, hydroxyl radical production, and subsequent cleavage of nucleosomal DNA around the dyad (Brogaard et al, 2012a). DNA fragments corresponding to ~200 bp NRL was generated by chemical cleavage, establishing it as a valid alternative for mapping nucleosome distribution in Tetrahymena ( Figure 6).…”
Section: General Approaches For Mapping Nucleosome Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While MNase digestion progressively removes the linker DNA, leaving mono-nucleosomes as the key product, hydroxyl radical cleavage occurs at two symmetric sites 6 bp away from the nucleosome dyad, allowing direct measurement of the exact position of a nucleosome and nucleosome repeat length (NRL) at base-pair resolution ( Figure 6A). Using an established histone mutagenesis procedure (Liu et al, 2004), H4 S47C mutation was introduced into Tetrahymena, allowing a chelated Cu + to be positioned near the nucleosome dyad, as well as localized production of hydroxyl radical and cleavage of nucleosomal DNA (Brogaard et al, 2012a;Flaus et al, 1996). Similarly, H3 C110A mutation was introduced to limit spurious reactions.…”
Section: Chemical Mapping Of Nucleosome Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, whether or not the regular chromatin fibers characterized in vitro and in silico are relevant to the higher-order organization of the genome in vivo remains an open question (21). The chromatin fibers characterized at the mesoscale level tend to be regular structures with evenly spaced nucleosomes, as opposed to the unevenly and sometimes more widely spaced arrays of nucleosomes detected at basepair resolution on whole genomes (22,23). The latter features have a dramatic effect on the mesoscale properties of simulated chromatin fibers, with the depletion of nucleosomes enhancing the predicted looping propensities to levels consistent with genomic data (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%