2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mapping study on design-time quality attributes and metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, this is the first study that collectively provides an estimation of TD principal, based on structural characteristics, and the repayment actions that need to be completed before the optimal system is reached. Current techniques are mostly based upon rule violations, and the proposed refactorings are resolving these violations, not heavily relying on structural aspects that hinder maintainability, such as coupling, cohesion, and complexity [4].…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this is the first study that collectively provides an estimation of TD principal, based on structural characteristics, and the repayment actions that need to be completed before the optimal system is reached. Current techniques are mostly based upon rule violations, and the proposed refactorings are resolving these violations, not heavily relying on structural aspects that hinder maintainability, such as coupling, cohesion, and complexity [4].…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we present the reusability models and indices that have been identified by a recent mapping study on design time‐quality attributes . For each reusability model/index, we present (a) the aspects of the software that are considered (eg, structural quality, documentation, etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guide “ reusers ” in the selection of the most adaptable asset (among the functionally fitting ones), reusability needs to be assessed, ie, the degree to which a certain asset can be reused in other systems. To this end, a wide range of reusability indices have been proposed; these indices are calculated as functions of metric scores that quantify factors that influence reusability. However, several research efforts in the literature on reusability assessment (see Section ) suffer from one or both of the following two limitations: (a) only highlight the parameters that should be considered in reusability assessment, thus, not providing an aggregated reusability measure , or (b) only consider structural aspects of the software asset , ignoring aspects such as documentation, external quality, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper 1 assists software engineers to make such decisions, by reviewing the literature (investigating 154 papers), and focusing on design-time quality attributes (QAs) and software metrics for quantifying them. The paper aims at aiding practitioners in applying a quality assurance process: First, based on the application domain and the development phase that they are interested (e.g., generic and maintenance, respectively), they can identify the QAs that are more frequently studied (e.g., Maintainability, Stability, and Changeability see Fig.…”
Section: Fig 1 Motivation Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%