2021
DOI: 10.3390/economies9010037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Markov-Switching Model of Inflation in Bolivia

Abstract: The Bolivian inflation process is analyzed utilizing a time-varying univariate and multivariate Markov-switching model (TMS). With monthly data and, beginning in the late 1930s, inflation is accurately described by a univariate TMS. The intercept for the high-inflation regime is significantly higher than for the low-inflation regime and the actual inflation rate mirrors the smoothing probabilities of the Markov process. Additionally, the predicted duration of each regime closely fits the periods when the count… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent literature on the quantity equation and inflation uses Markov switching models to describe inflation. Bojanic (2021) analyzed the Bolivian inflation process by utilizing a time-varying univariate and multivariate Markov switching model, and found that the results generally fall in line with what the quantity theory of money predicts. He further found that by partitioning the sources of inflation, he can demonstrate that, from a long-term perspective and in a high-inflation regime, differences in inflation are mostly explained by GDP growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most recent literature on the quantity equation and inflation uses Markov switching models to describe inflation. Bojanic (2021) analyzed the Bolivian inflation process by utilizing a time-varying univariate and multivariate Markov switching model, and found that the results generally fall in line with what the quantity theory of money predicts. He further found that by partitioning the sources of inflation, he can demonstrate that, from a long-term perspective and in a high-inflation regime, differences in inflation are mostly explained by GDP growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This finding is in line with our findings. However, in contrast to Bojanic (2021), we further determine the relative explanatory contribution of GDP growth to money and velocity by estimating the parameters holistically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated the short-term interest rate by including only the constant as the explanatory variable. The regimes are generally identified according to the estimated constant terms, the standard deviations or transition probabilities (Bojanic, 2021).…”
Section: The Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated the short-term interest rate by including only the constant as the explanatory variable. The regimes are generally identified according to the estimated constant terms, the standard deviations or transition probabilities (Bojanic, 2021). Results of our estimations presented in Table 2 revealed that the constant term of regime 1 (0.041) is inferior to that of regime 2 (0.070).…”
Section: Identification and Characterization Of Regimesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Besides, individual markets experience varying predictability levels attributable to market conditions (Urquhart and McGroarty 2016) and hence, nonlinear modelling of the market dynamics is required to ascertain accurate conclusions about the behavior of economic variables, such as the performance of fund portfolios. Bojanic (2021) explained that Markov switching models are mostly employed for the analysis of macroeconomic and financial variables as the dynamics of these variables are subject to periodic and systemic fluctuations over time. Pastpipatkul et al (2020) also affirmed that Markov switching models help to account for dynamic change in economic data because the economic factors exhibit varying levels of dependencies under different market conditions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%