2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1084-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical model for quantifying training

Abstract: A systems modelling approach has been used to quantify the dose-response nature of training. Considerable attention has been focused on the modelling process with little work on the determination of the training impulse (TRIMP) scores. Currently, the methods employed to calculate TRIMPs are subject to various limitations including the use of generic ordinal category or exponential weighting factors for higher exercise intensities. These weightings are necessary to prevent excessively high scores from long dura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While these metrics are gaining popularity among athletes, they have yet to be rigorously validated (51), with Skiba having reported a preliminary evaluation of the TSS metric (91). Finally, a modified TRIMP based on CP has been recently proposed by Hayes and Quinn (42), but it too remains to be validated. We describe in detail the computations for quantifying a cycling workout using both TRIMP and BikeScore in Fig.…”
Section: Power (W)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While these metrics are gaining popularity among athletes, they have yet to be rigorously validated (51), with Skiba having reported a preliminary evaluation of the TSS metric (91). Finally, a modified TRIMP based on CP has been recently proposed by Hayes and Quinn (42), but it too remains to be validated. We describe in detail the computations for quantifying a cycling workout using both TRIMP and BikeScore in Fig.…”
Section: Power (W)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Time is the variable that must be most strictly controlled in this phase. As stated by other authors in relation with a series of TL tools [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], it is essential to know the duration of each exercise in order to calculate the TL. For example, in this session the total duration was 75 minutes, of which the players were active for only 61 minutes (49 minutes to do the exercises and 12 minutes to drink).…”
Section: Daily Training Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is calculated as the duration (in minutes) multiplied by an intensity factor which is differently defined for men and women. Due to its complexity, several authors have tried to simplify it [10,11,12]. Yet all the attempts are still quite complex mathematically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were also reported during training sessions by all subjects using a modifi ed (0-10) Borg scale ( 4 ). The training load was calculated for each individual at each training session using a heart rate based TRIMP score ( 13 ).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%