1988
DOI: 10.1002/mma.1670100306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical study of a continuum‐state cross‐bridge model of muscle contraction

Abstract: Communicated by K. P. HadelerIn the framework of the sliding-filament theory of muscle contraction, we develop a model which describes physiological cross-bridge activity with a continuum of states, from those which are detached and refractory to those which are attached. The latter are kinetically more important.An analytical study of the non-linear partial differential equations of the mathematical model shows existence and uniqueness of the solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the main interest of this paper is focused on the introduction of plasticity, in order to describe the contractile element we consider a simple sliding-filament model; other more sophisticated models (such as those introduced in [10], [12], [23], [25], and [27]) could be used without great additional difficulty. For the 3 same reasons we assume the muscle structures to be elastoplastic (with work hardening, i.e., the threshold separating two types of behavior can depend on the history of the deformation) instead of viscoelastoplastic, as may be more reasonable (see [11] for viscoelastic properties).…”
Section: Introduction and Presentation Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the main interest of this paper is focused on the introduction of plasticity, in order to describe the contractile element we consider a simple sliding-filament model; other more sophisticated models (such as those introduced in [10], [12], [23], [25], and [27]) could be used without great additional difficulty. For the 3 same reasons we assume the muscle structures to be elastoplastic (with work hardening, i.e., the threshold separating two types of behavior can depend on the history of the deformation) instead of viscoelastoplastic, as may be more reasonable (see [11] for viscoelastic properties).…”
Section: Introduction and Presentation Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%