2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
901
1
59

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,257 publications
(979 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
18
901
1
59
Order By: Relevance
“…Issues under discussion included: experience of SME with lean methods, success of lean projects in product development, application, efforts undertaken to introduce known lean methods and their potential and benefits, the influence of Industry 4.0 in the application of lean principles in product development, difficulties in the introduction of Industry 4.0 in product development, and the need for smart products (cyber-physical products). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and the maturity of manufacturing enterprises is described by Schumacher et al (2016). He examines nine dimensions, including strategy, leadership, customers, product, operations, culture, people, governance, and technology, and accompanies each dimension with exemplary maturity items.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues under discussion included: experience of SME with lean methods, success of lean projects in product development, application, efforts undertaken to introduce known lean methods and their potential and benefits, the influence of Industry 4.0 in the application of lean principles in product development, difficulties in the introduction of Industry 4.0 in product development, and the need for smart products (cyber-physical products). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and the maturity of manufacturing enterprises is described by Schumacher et al (2016). He examines nine dimensions, including strategy, leadership, customers, product, operations, culture, people, governance, and technology, and accompanies each dimension with exemplary maturity items.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BPMM and CMMI are representatives of the most famous MMs developed [14,25]. Leyh et al [26], Gökalp et al [27], Schumacher et al [28], and Luftman [29] are representatives of scientific MM approaches from different years. Property of the organization, which represents the object/area/process of investigation; used by one or more maturity level and can be related to a dimension within an organization Factor specification Technical and foundational requirement construct for determining the maturity level; acts as the maturity level's individual expression of a factor (needed due to multi-usage of factors) Indicator Measurable property of one or more factors within an organization; uses an indicator type for measurement Indicator type…”
Section: Meta Model Application and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the dimensions "Strategy", "Leadership", Governance, "Culture" and "People" allow for including organizational aspects into the assessment (Schumacher et al 2016). Features and capabilities of an organization in different aspects of the SCKM are, in fact, the organizational maturity in SCKM.…”
Section: Impact-oriented For It-based Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%