2018
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201802530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Maverick Asymmetrical Backbone with Distinct Flanked Twist Angles Modulating the Molecular Aggregation and Crystallinity for High Performance Nonfullerene Solar Cells

Abstract: energy source. [1][2][3][4] The past few years have witnessed the rapid progress of nonfullerene n-type acceptors and the PCE of nonfullerene-based PSCs devices have already surpassed 13% for single-junction devices. [5][6][7][8][9] To achieve efficient nonfullerene PSCs and mature fully from research into cost effective products, it is of critical importance not only to design high-performance small molecular acceptors (SMAs), but also to develop matching donor polymers, as well as to deeply understand the me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the dropped PCE was observed after further fluorination in PIDTT-TFBT, which was mainly restricted by undesired morphology for photoactive layer as a result of strong aggregation even if in the condition of the upshifted V OC . Our preliminary results can demonstrate that modulating the π-bridge in polymer backbone was an effective method with the aim to enhance the performance for solar cell.Polymers 2020, 12, 368 2 of 22 (CPs) and n-type small molecules (i.e., PCBM or ITIC etc.,) have received an increasing attention because of excellent superiorities, such as, low-cost, light weight, mechanical flexibility, and low temperature solution processing [3][4][5][6][7]. To date, power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of PSCs have surpassed over 11% [8] in fullerene-accepter system and 15% in non-fullerene system [9], respectively, profited by the design of novel materials, optimization of morphology for photoactive layer and the deepened understanding of the structure-performance relationship [4,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dropped PCE was observed after further fluorination in PIDTT-TFBT, which was mainly restricted by undesired morphology for photoactive layer as a result of strong aggregation even if in the condition of the upshifted V OC . Our preliminary results can demonstrate that modulating the π-bridge in polymer backbone was an effective method with the aim to enhance the performance for solar cell.Polymers 2020, 12, 368 2 of 22 (CPs) and n-type small molecules (i.e., PCBM or ITIC etc.,) have received an increasing attention because of excellent superiorities, such as, low-cost, light weight, mechanical flexibility, and low temperature solution processing [3][4][5][6][7]. To date, power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of PSCs have surpassed over 11% [8] in fullerene-accepter system and 15% in non-fullerene system [9], respectively, profited by the design of novel materials, optimization of morphology for photoactive layer and the deepened understanding of the structure-performance relationship [4,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. shows the Nyquist plot of the devices with and without Cd-doped buffer layer, which was measured in dark condition, 5% CZO ETL significantly lower than other devices, indicating more efficient electron extraction and reducing interfacial charge recombination at interface [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The photovoltaic performance of BHJ PSCs was highly dependent on the semiconductor materials used as the photoactive layer. Thus, tremendous efforts in the past decades have been devoted to exploring excellent semiconducting materials, such as conjugated copolymers (CPs) and small molecules (SMs), and the use of various additives to modulate the morphology and optimization of processing techniques [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Recently, with the help of novel materials, improved morphology, much more profound understanding of the structure-performance correlation and the photon-to-electron conversion mechanism, and power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) for PSCs in the single-junction module of over 11% in fullerene systems [35] and over 16% in non-fullerene systems [36][37][38][39] were achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has proved that constructing donor-acceptor (D-A) type CPs and/or SMs appears to be one of the most simplistic, promising, attractive, and successful strategies, since the alternating D-A conjugated blocks in the polymer backbone not only led to the reduction of the band gap by hybridizing the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) with the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), but also enhanced the inter-and intra-molecular interactions directly governing the molecular ordering and π-π stacking for conjugated materials in the solid state. As a consequence, the molecular properties for D-A type semiconducting materials, such as frontier energy levels, absorption, dipole moment, planarity of the backbone, intermolecular interaction, charge transport characteristics, and morphology could be fine-modulated by judiciously selecting D and A units and properly combining them, assisted by adjusting the photo-induced intra-molecular charge transfer (ICT) effect [7,[20][21][22][23][24]26,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. In order to maximize the PCE of PSCs, it was of critical importance that, on one hand, enlarging the difference as much as possible between the E HOMO of donor and E LUMO of acceptor could obtain a larger open-circuit voltage (V OC ), meanwhile the suitable E LUMO paired with the electron acceptor was also juggled for charge separation and transport, while on the other hand, reducing the optical band gap toward harvesting more photons by up-shifting the E HOMO or down-shifting the E LUMO was anticipated to yield higher short-circuit current density (J SC ) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%