A Mean‐Preserving Increase in Ambiguity and Portfolio Choices

Abstract

This article investigates under what conditions an increase in ambiguity reduces demand for an uncertain asset (or raises demand for coinsurance). We find that the comparative statics of ambiguity and of risks have structural similarities under the smooth ambiguity aversion model (Klibanoff, Marinacci, and Mukerji, ()). The determinant condition on ambiguity preferences is analogous to that on risk preferences. However, the comparative statics have fundamental differences under the α‐maxmin model (Ghirardato, Maccheroni, and Marinacci, ()). When relative risk aversion is less than 1, only an increase in ambiguity, which broadens support for an investor's belief in the probability of the return distribution in the manner of a strong increase in risk, can reduce demand for an uncertain asset.

Tax-Preferred Savings Vehicles: Can Financial Education Improve Asset Location Decisions?

“…where λ 1 and λ 2 are the non-negative multipliers for φ ≥ 0 and φ ≤ 1, respectively, and u 1 and u 2 denote the marginal utilities of consumption in each period. From the boundary 10 Lachance (2013) and Brown et al (2017) present more sophisticated life-cycle models with tax risk, and Huang and Tzeng (2018) includes ambiguity.…”

Portfolio allocation problems between risky and ambiguous assets

“…Then, we say thatỹ j is greater thanỹ i in the sense of RHRD, denoted ∈ [a, b], where G θ and g θ denote the probability distribution function ofỹ θ and the probability density function of y θ for θ ∈ Θ, respectively. 19 Kijima and Ohnishi (1996, Theorem 3.3) show that…”

Optimal Insurance Demand When Contract Nonperformance Risk Is Perceived As Ambiguous

“…11 Then, it is straightforward to show that, if the con-10 Notice that the interpretation of β is not independent of the support of the distribution of beliefs. See Huang and Tzeng (2016) for a recent application to portfolio choice.…”