A measure of interpersonal dominance

Knott, Paul D.; Drost, Bruce A.

doi:10.3758/bf03209889

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Five of the measures were obtained from Task 1. The number of wins scored by each partner in the dyad is a tabulation of the number of female and male partners' choices that were included in the joint solution when there were differences of opinion between them (Knott & Drost, 1969). Two trained raters listened to the recorded verbal interactions to obtain the next four measures of dominance.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads.

Davis¹,

Gilbert²

1989

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads.

Davis¹,

Gilbert²

1989

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It may be distinguished from agression, because it does not involve the intent to harm the person being controlled, and from leadership, because the dominating person's actions are not always voluntarily accepted by those being manipulated. Knott and Drost (1969) have reported a promising paradigm in which they measured interpersonal dominance behaviorally as the number of contributions a person makes to a joint decision. Adams and Landers (1978) modified Knott and Drost's design for use with sameand mixed-sex dyads.…”

Section: Kathrynx a Adamsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other studies have examined the effects of sex or race as status characteristics, and although most of these studies did not use the term dominance, the dependent measures were very similar to Knott and Drost's (1969) definition of dominance. White females have been found to be less likely than white males or black females to initiate verbal acts or to assume positions of influence (Fenelon & Megargee, 1971;Lockheed & Hall, 1976).…”

Section: Kathrynx a Adamsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since investigators (Goldberg, 1974;Sistrunk & McDavid, 1971) have pointed out that the nature of an experimental task may contribute to sex differences in behaviors, a questionnaire was designed that listed 12 tasks that could fit the task requirements of the Knott and Drost (1969) paradigm. White and black, male and female college students in introductory classes indicated whether each task could be performed more competently by the average female, the average male, or either of the sexes.…”

Section: Taskmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Who has the final word? Sex, race, and dominance behavior.

Adams¹

1980

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of sex and race on a form of dominance behavior were investigated as a function of a challenger's sex and race. Dominance was defined as the number of verbal challenges against a subject's picture choice that a subject withstood. Dyads (N = 128) composed of a student and a confederate recorded individual preferences and joint decisions for the more attractive picture of 20 pairs of pictures. The number of challenges a student sustained each time a disagreement occurred regarding the more attractive picture of a pair was recorded. Results supported the theory of status characteristics when subjects participated with white confederates: Black females were more dominant than white females and black males (p < .OS), and white males were more dominant than black males (p < .05). With a black confederate, however, black males became significantly more dominant (p < .05), whereas the behavior of the other three groups did not change. All subjects withstood significantly fewer challenges from females than from males (p < .05). These results suggest that sex and race cannot be viewed solely as subject variables that create differences in behavior. Instead these variables interact, and one must examine the characteristics (in this case sex and race) of group members (situation variables) as well as the characteristics of a single person to obtain an accurate picture of mixed-sex or biracial interactions.

show abstract

“…The D16 instrument is a versatile cold-neutron diffractometer which has evolved from the first biological membrane diffractometers from the early seventies, and has benefited from a number of upgrades over the years, such as the installation of MILAND (MIllimeter resolution Large Area Neutron Detector [1]), a large-area 3 He Multi-Wire Proportional Chamber (MWPC) in 2011. This detector provided a resolution of 1 x 1 mm 2 over an area of 32 x 32 cm 2 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a large-area curved Trench-MWPC ³He detector for the D16 neutron diffractometer at the ILL

Buffet,

Cristiglio,

Cuccaro

et al. 2023

EPJ Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The D16 instrument is a versatile cold-neutron diffractometer at the ILL. It has benefited from a number of upgrades over the years, such as the installation of a large-area 3He Multi-Wire Proportional Chamber (MWPC) in 2011. This detector has provided a resolution of 1 mm x 1 mm over an area of 32 cm x 32 cm. After 12 years of operation, it was replaced by a new curved detector which covers a wider solid angle while maintaining a high angular resolution. Its 86° horizontal angular coverage makes it possible to perform time-resolved experiments with a large q-range. This new detector is based on the Trench-MWPC detector technology developed at the ILL. In the D16 Trench-MWPC, 6 modules are mounted side by side in an 3He-filled curved vessel. Each module consists of 192 cathode blades positioned every 2 mm, and 192 anode wires spaced by 1.5 mm. The radius of curvature of the cathode blades is 1150 mm, providing a parallax-free resolution of 0.075°, horizontally along the 86° angular coverage of the 38 cm high detector. The various steps of the fabrication and mechanical inspection of the D16 Trench-MWPC detector modules and pressure vessel are presented, as well as experimental results obtained during the characterisation of the detector with neutrons.

show abstract

A measure of interpersonal dominance

Cited by 6 publications

References 6 publications

Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads.

Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads.

Who has the final word? Sex, race, and dominance behavior.

Development of a large-area curved Trench-MWPC ³He detector for the D16 neutron diffractometer at the ILL

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

A measure of interpersonal dominance

Cited by 6 publications

References 6 publications

Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads.

Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women's dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads.

Who has the final word? Sex, race, and dominance behavior.

Development of a large-area curved Trench-MWPC 3He detector for the D16 neutron diffractometer at the ILL

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Development of a large-area curved Trench-MWPC ³He detector for the D16 neutron diffractometer at the ILL