Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements 1988
DOI: 10.1109/cpem.1988.671332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Measurement of the NBS Electrical Watt in SI Units

Abstract: = K, = 1-(16.69 f 1.33) ppm.The uncertainty of 1.33 ppm has the significance of a standard deviation and includes our best estimate of random and known or suspected systematic uncertainties. The mean time of the measurement is May 15, 1988. Combined with the recent measurement of the NBS ohm in SI units: Q N B \ / Q = Ki2 = 1-(1.593 f 0.022) ppm, this leads to a Josephson frequency/voltage quotient of E, = E,[1 + (7.94 f 0.67) ppm] where Eo = 483 594 GHz/V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, we have two ways to measure this profile, from the quotient versus displacement or from the quotient versus displacement. In our previous work [3] the quotient profile was used exclusively, but the measurement is time consuming and subject to hysteretic effects in the knife edge. Alternatively, measuring the quotient over 0.1 mm intervals produces an 800 point profile with typically 100 W/W noise.…”
Section: B Force-current (F/i) Quotientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fortunately, we have two ways to measure this profile, from the quotient versus displacement or from the quotient versus displacement. In our previous work [3] the quotient profile was used exclusively, but the measurement is time consuming and subject to hysteretic effects in the knife edge. Alternatively, measuring the quotient over 0.1 mm intervals produces an 800 point profile with typically 100 W/W noise.…”
Section: B Force-current (F/i) Quotientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same quantity of power is calculated from the measured electrical and mechanical quantities, by comparing the force times the velocity to the voltage times the current. As an indication of its earlier accuracy, the 1988 NIST value for the watt derived from this basic design had a relative combined standard uncertainty of 1.3 W/W [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The discontinuity in the value of the kilogram introduced by the new definition would thus be limited to this amount. Based on the results to date from the moving-coil force balance measurements of 2e/h at the National Physical Laboratory, U.K. [ 5 ] , and the National Bureau of Stan-U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright dards, U.S. [6], such an uncertainty for 2 e / h does not seem totally out of reach. A new definition of the kilogram derived from precision electromagnetic measurements could be the subject of a talk at a CPEM in the first decade of the 21st century!'…”
Section: Electromagnetic Measurements and The Fundamental Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the devices used to relate the mechanical and electrical units is the watt-balance apparatus [ 11- [4]. This apparatus compares the force of a mass in gravity to the force on a current in a magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now that the longterm stability for maintaining the electrical units is greater than that for maintaining the mass unit lo-' for voltage and resistance versus ,lo-* for the kg), can the watt-balance be used, in reverse, to monitor the stability of the mass standard? That is the proposal of B. Kibble in [2] and the purpose of a project in the UK [l], [21 and one in the U.S. [31, [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%