2005
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanistic link between chick diet and decline in seabirds?

Abstract: A climatic regime shift during the mid-1970s in the North Pacific resulted in decreased availability of lipidrich fish to seabirds and was followed by a dramatic decline in number of kittiwakes breeding on the Pribilof Islands. Although production of chicks in the mid-1970s was adequate to sustain kittiwake populations in the early 1980s, the disappearance of birds from breeding colonies apparently exceeded recruitment. No mechanism has been proposed to explain why recruitment would differ among fledglings fed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, we do not know whether and to what extent the increased corticosterone level compromises the birds' future fitness. A nutritional deficit during development can affect the quality of nestlings, which is likely to compromise their cognitive abilities, immune function, and results in increased mortality (Kitaysky et al 2003(Kitaysky et al , 2006Loiseau et al 2008). Therefore, when the fitness costs are higher than the benefits, a reduced parental investment might be adaptive (Angelier et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we do not know whether and to what extent the increased corticosterone level compromises the birds' future fitness. A nutritional deficit during development can affect the quality of nestlings, which is likely to compromise their cognitive abilities, immune function, and results in increased mortality (Kitaysky et al 2003(Kitaysky et al , 2006Loiseau et al 2008). Therefore, when the fitness costs are higher than the benefits, a reduced parental investment might be adaptive (Angelier et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such food has only half the calorific value of Cape gannets' natural prey (Batchelor & Ross 1984). In this context, the junk-food hypothesis ( JFH) posits that seabirds feeding on prey of low energy and nutrient content have reduced reproductive success (Piatt & Anderson 1996), because such a diet affects the growth patterns and the cognitive abilities of their offspring (Kitaysky et al 2005;Wanless et al 2005). The JFH has so far been tested for seabirds and marine mammals facing natural changes in diet quality, for instance after an ecosystem shift (Rosen & Trites 2000;Litzow et al 2002;Jodice et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rissa brevirostris Kitaysky et al 2005 Klaassen & Bech 1992; Øyan & Anker-Nilssen 1996;Kitaysky 1999;Mullers et al 2009 Cerorhinca monocerata 480-620 g…”
Section: ; Niizuma and Yamamura 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%