2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mesh-free particle model for simulation of mobile-bed dam break

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Laplacian for the pressure and viscosity term is formulated as the hybrid of a standard SPH first derivative coupled with a finite difference approximation for the first derivative [4]. Furthermore, it has been found that the resulting second derivative of the kernel is very sensitive to particle disorder and will easily lead to pressure instability and decoupling in the computation due to the co-location of the velocity and pressure [8].…”
Section: Isph Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Laplacian for the pressure and viscosity term is formulated as the hybrid of a standard SPH first derivative coupled with a finite difference approximation for the first derivative [4]. Furthermore, it has been found that the resulting second derivative of the kernel is very sensitive to particle disorder and will easily lead to pressure instability and decoupling in the computation due to the co-location of the velocity and pressure [8].…”
Section: Isph Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems are difficult to simulate due to the existence of the arbitrarily moving surface boundary conditions and also because of the complex governing Navier Stokes Equations (NSEs) [1]. Also, the dam break problem has been the subject of many analytical, experimental, and numerical studies for hydraulics scientists and engineers [2,3,4].The marker and cell [5] and Volume Of Fluid (VOF), [6] methods are the most common methods for simulating such flows, in which the Navier-Stokes equations are solved on a fixed Eulerian grid [7]. In MAC method marker particles were used to define the free surface while in VOF method the governing equations are solved for the volume fraction of the fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this surface force may contribute, or even dominate, the soil deformation of the slide, which in turn influences the flow characteristics of water. Shakibaeinia and Jin (2011) employed a fluid-fluid interface coupling technique in the scope of N-S equation with different material parameters instead of elasto-plastic model which many engineers on soil mechanics would prefer for landslide problems. Unilateral coupling methods, such as sediment flushing where a Mohr-Coulomb erosion criterion is used to decide the interfacial soil particle to be at rest or eroded by Manenti et al (2012) , would not work in the simulation of impulse waves.…”
Section: Soil-water Coupling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hayashi et al (2003) used the Moving Particle Semi-implicit (MPS) method combined with a bed scour model based on erosion velocity to compute the seawall toe scouring due to a dropping jet. Shakibaeinia and Jin (2011) used the weakly compressible MPS formulation together with different rheological models to compute an unsteady dam break flow over movable bed. On the other hand, the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method has recently been explored in many coastal and hydraulic applications due to its high accuracy and flexibility in adapting to a wide range of flow scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%