Having surveyed the history and methods of meta-regression in a previous paper, in this paper, we review which and how meta-regression methods are applied in recent research syntheses. To do so, we reviewed studies published in 2016 across four leading research synthesis journals: Psychological Bulletin, the Journal of Applied Psychology, Review of Educational Research, and the Cochrane Library. We find that the best practices defined in the previous review are rarely carried out in practice. In light of the identified discrepancies, we consider how to move forward, first by identifying areas where further methods development is needed to address persistent problems in the field and second by discussing how to more effectively disseminate points of methodological consensus. technical, conceptual, and practical developments in methodology from the past 40 years. We begin by reviewing consensus points from our review of methodological developments and best practices. We then summarize findings from previous reviews of methodological practice conducted over the past 15 years, focusing on findings that shed light on the practice of meta-regression. Finally, we conduct a new-albeit limited-review of the applied literature, examining 64 meta-analyses published during the year 2016 in four leading journals: Psychological Bulletin, the Review of Educational Research, the Journal of Applied Psychology, and the Cochrane Library. Our review examines current practices in light of the technical, conceptual, and practical areas of methodological development, as identified in our companion paper. We conclude by considering the disconnects between meta-regression methodology and meta-regression practice and suggesting possible avenues to move forward as a field.