A Meta‐analysis of Food Demand Elasticities for China

Abstract

We conducted a meta‐analysis of food and agricultural demand elasticities for China, and used the results to derive estimates of income, own‐price, and cross‐price elasticities of demand that can be used in models of food and agricultural markets. Consistent with expectations, we find that income elasticities of demand for many food products decline as per capita income increases. The declines are relatively large for alcohol and tobacco, and smaller for livestock products. Contrary to expectations, own‐price elasticities for some products become more price‐elastic as per capita income increases. One explanation may be that economic development brings with it improvements in food supply chains that provide people more choices with respect to food products than those traditionally consumed in rural villages, leading to greater substitution possibilities and more price‐elastic demands. Estimates for 2011 of income and own‐price demand elasticities are generally reasonable, whereas deriving reliable estimates of cross‐price elasticities is difficult. The estimates suggest that China's meat and dairy demands, and in turn livestock feed demands, will continue growing strongly. Policy‐makers should continue to monitor the evolution of demand for these products with an eye toward ensuring food security, particularly given the sheer size of the population and relatively tight domestic food supply situation in China.

Predicting the changes in the structure of food demand in China

“…For rural residents (Table ), the income elasticities of beef and mutton, poultry meat, and vegetables are higher than one, and the elasticities for other seven commodities range from 0.389 to 0.869. While the elasticities from this study are not exactly the same as those from previous studies, all the elasticity estimates for both urban and rural residents from this study fall within the range of elasticities of previous studies surveyed by Abler () and Chen, Abler, Zhou, Yu, and Thompson (). As noted by Abler (), differences of elasticities from different studies might be attributed to the time period for the data analyzed in a study, as well as whether a study uses a single‐stage demand system model or a two‐ or three‐stage demand system model.…”

Meat consumption and democratic governance: A cross-national analysis

“…These findings are consistent with the current literature (e.g. Gallet, 2011a;2011b;Tian and Yu, 2015;Zhou, Yu and Herzfeld, 2015;Chen et al, 2015) and meat consumption statistics. The FAO statistics show that the global per capita meat consumption reached 42.4 kg per year in 2011, which represents a relatively high level 2 .…”

An econometric analysis of demand for food quantity and quality in urban China

“…This finding that own‐price elasticities have become less inelastic for a number of food products in China may be related to the recent economic progress in the country. Specifically, economic development–driven improvement in food availability has led to greater substitution possibilities vis‐à‐vis rural China through the emergence of more advanced food supply chains, while rising consumer incomes have steadily improved food accessibility (Chen et al., ).…”