2016
DOI: 10.17743/jaes.2016.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analysis of High Resolution Audio Perceptual Evaluation

Abstract: There is considerable debate over the benefits of recording and rendering high resolution audio, i.e., systems and formats that are capable of rendering beyond CD quality audio. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the ability of test subjects to perceive a difference between high resolution and standard, 16 bit, 44.1 or 48 kHz audio. All 18 published experiments for which sufficient data could be obtained were included, providing a meta-analysis involving over 400 participants in over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the listening tests provided participants with some form of informal training for the object recognition (it was found that the object recognition test provides negligible training for the listening test). This is in line with results from [32] where it was found that participant training was the dominant factor in determining whether or not similar tests produced significant results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Clearly, the listening tests provided participants with some form of informal training for the object recognition (it was found that the object recognition test provides negligible training for the listening test). This is in line with results from [32] where it was found that participant training was the dominant factor in determining whether or not similar tests produced significant results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Why higher resolutions should sound more transparent than CD has been debated for the past 30 years. High resolution formatting does not guarantee a perception of transparency, but music professionals with access to first generation data have widely reported subjectively better sound, and a meta-analysis of previously published listening tests comparing high resolution to CD found a clear, though small, audible difference that significantly increased when the listening tests included standard training [67]. This section considers four proposals for sonic differences, the third and especially fourth of which are the ones broadly accepted as likely.…”
Section: High Resolution Sound "Why?"mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In principle, formal listening tests carried out comparatively across different system set-ups might help to resolve the question of hardware contributions [67]. At a minimum, design for auditory testing must be careful to exclude known sources of hardware distortion.…”
Section: Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sec. 13.7 includes some references including the metastudy by Reiss [41] and one in which great pains were taken to isolate parameters [42].…”
Section: Designing Listening Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%