2019
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta‐analysis of plant responses to light intensity for 70 traits ranging from molecules to whole plant performance

Abstract: Summary By means of meta‐analyses we determined how 70 traits related to plant anatomy, morphology, chemistry, physiology, growth and reproduction are affected by daily light integral (DLI; mol photons m−2 d−1). A large database including 500 experiments with 760 plant species enabled us to determine generalized dose–response curves. Many traits increase with DLI in a saturating fashion. Some showed a more than 10‐fold increase over the DLI range of 1–50 mol m−2 d−1, such as the number of seeds produced per pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

37
359
5
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 406 publications
(406 citation statements)
references
References 586 publications
37
359
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, plants grown under reduced PFD increased SLA, which is a very common morphological response to shading (Poorter et al, ) and enhances light interception (Björkman, ; Gómez, Guenni, & Bravo de Guenni, ; Roscher, Kutsch, Kolle, Ziegler, & Schulze, ). There are copious studies on both morphological and physiological adjustments of plants to low light intensity (for reviews see Kami, Lorrain, Hornitschek, & Fankhauser, ; Lewis, ; Turnbull, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…As expected, plants grown under reduced PFD increased SLA, which is a very common morphological response to shading (Poorter et al, ) and enhances light interception (Björkman, ; Gómez, Guenni, & Bravo de Guenni, ; Roscher, Kutsch, Kolle, Ziegler, & Schulze, ). There are copious studies on both morphological and physiological adjustments of plants to low light intensity (for reviews see Kami, Lorrain, Hornitschek, & Fankhauser, ; Lewis, ; Turnbull, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More pronounced growth stimulation of shade-tolerant species by elevated [CO 2 ] was confirmed in a meta-analysis by Kerstiens (2001). However, differences between shade-tolerant and shadeintolerant species only occurred at high DLIs (Poorter et al, 2019). Kerstiens (1998) (Kerstiens, 2001).…”
Section: Responses To Elevated [Co 2 ] Are Speciesspecificmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…More pronounced growth stimulation of shade‐tolerant species by elevated [CO 2 ] was confirmed in a meta‐analysis by Kerstiens (). However, differences between shade‐tolerant and shade‐intolerant species only occurred at high DLIs (Poorter et al, ). Kerstiens () suggested that shade‐tolerance as such does not play a role in response to elevated [CO 2 ], but that functional traits associated with the ability to survive suppression of growth in the forest understorey are crucial for growth response to elevated [CO 2 ] (e.g., ability to harvest light, water, and nutrients).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Species that adjust their physiological or morphological traits to take advantage of spatially variable light availability or temporally variable water and nutrient availability in low‐resource systems may outperform less plastic neighboring species (Funk , Poorter et al. ). Thus, our results confirm the importance of intraspecific variation especially for species of wider distributions across steep environmental gradients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%