2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12920-018-0357-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of public microarray data identifies biological regulatory networks in Parkinson’s disease

Abstract: BackgroundParkinson’s disease (PD) is a long-term degenerative disease that is caused by environmental and genetic factors. The networks of genes and their regulators that control the progression and development of PD require further elucidation.MethodsWe examine common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from several PD blood and substantia nigra (SN) microarray datasets by meta-analysis. Further we screen the PD-specific genes from common DEGs using GCBI. Next, we used a series of bioinformatics software t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(115 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the luciferase data supported the competitive relationship between LINC02381 and these three miRNAs. These data are consistent with previous studies that have identified this lncRNA as a CeRNA (39)(40)(41). Previous studies have noted that LINC02381 is capable to control several biological functions via sequestering different miRNAs, thereby changing the expressions of target genes (32,39,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…and the luciferase data supported the competitive relationship between LINC02381 and these three miRNAs. These data are consistent with previous studies that have identified this lncRNA as a CeRNA (39)(40)(41). Previous studies have noted that LINC02381 is capable to control several biological functions via sequestering different miRNAs, thereby changing the expressions of target genes (32,39,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Su et al performed a meta-analysis on five public PD data sets from the substantia nigra by determining the intersection of the DEGs from the five individual data sets, and identified 17 common DEGs [88]. Three of these genes were also DEGs for PD in our study, 2 of them were not measured in all PD data sets in our study, and the remaining 12 were not differentially expressed in our study, which was based on twice as many data sets as the study of Su et al…”
Section: Comparison With Other Meta-analyses On Pd and Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis () (34) was used to download DEGs from the TCGA database, using the following criteria: log2 |fold change (FC)|>1 and P<0.05. In addition, the Gene-Cloud of Biotechnology Information (35) was used to analyze BC microarrays obtained from the GEO database, using the following search logic: (Affymetrix) and (neoplasm* OR cancer OR adenocarcinoma OR malignant* OR carcinoma OR tumor) and (breast OR mammary). DEGs were selected from the GEO database, again under the following criteria: log2 |FC|> 1 and P<0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%