2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metal-organic framework for C2H2/CO2 separation under highly humid conditions: Balanced hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), as an emerging and burgeoning class of adsorbent materials, have drawn extensive attention, because of their tunable pore structures and surface functionalities. These features enable MOFs with great potential in the application of light hydrocarbon separations, especially for C 2 H 6 /C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 , , CH 4 /N 2 , C 2 H 2 /CH 4 , 1-butene/2-butene, and C 2 H 2 /CO 2 mixtures. With respect to the separation of C 2 H 2 /CH 4 and C 2 H 2 /CO 2 , considerable progress has been made in the usage of MOFs to promote the C 2 H 2 binding affinity and separation selectivity through the introduction of open metal sites (OMSs) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), as an emerging and burgeoning class of adsorbent materials, have drawn extensive attention, because of their tunable pore structures and surface functionalities. These features enable MOFs with great potential in the application of light hydrocarbon separations, especially for C 2 H 6 /C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 , , CH 4 /N 2 , C 2 H 2 /CH 4 , 1-butene/2-butene, and C 2 H 2 /CO 2 mixtures. With respect to the separation of C 2 H 2 /CH 4 and C 2 H 2 /CO 2 , considerable progress has been made in the usage of MOFs to promote the C 2 H 2 binding affinity and separation selectivity through the introduction of open metal sites (OMSs) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, the adsorption capacity of C 2 H 2 (2.25 mmol g −1 ) is modest for NUM-11a at 298 K and 1.0 bar, higher than or comparable to many well-known MOFs, such as Cu-FINA-2 (approximately 1.79 mmol g −1 ), 33 CPL-1 (1.84 mmol g −1 ) and CPL-1-NH 2 (2.01 mmol g −1 ), 34 M'MOF-3a (1.90 mmol g −1 ), 35 UiO-66-(COOH) 2 (2.16 mmol g −1 ), 36 JNU-1 (2.67 mmol g −1 ), 37 Ni 3 (pzdc) 2 (7Hade) 2 (2.36 mmol g −1 ), 38 NKMOF-1-Cu (2.27 mmol g −1 ), 8 and Cu I @UiO-66-(COOH) 2 (2.31 mmol g −1 ). 36 NUM-11a shows relatively small CO 2 adsorption amounts (1.27 mmol g −1 ) under the same situations, resulting in a well C 2 H 2 /CO 2 uptake ration of 1.78, higher than or comparable to those of UiO-66-(COOH) 2 (1.29), 36 JNU-2 (2.1), 39 etc. In addition, the small adsorption amount for C 2 H 4 also causes a modest C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 uptake ratio of 1.3, comparable to that of NKMOF-1-Ni (1.28), 8 FeMOF-74 (1.11), 40 and NOTT-300…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…At 100 kPa and 298 K, the C 2 H 2 /CO 2 selectivity in the equimolar binary mixture is 3.3, implying the applicability of CuZn 3 (PDDA) 3 (OH) for C 2 H 2 purification (Figure c). Despite that the calculated selectivity is lower than several MOFs with high-density open metal sites (NKMOF-1-Ni, 30; UTSA-74, 9; and JNU-2, 3.5) and MOFs with fluorinated pillars (SIFSIX-Cu-TPA, 5.3; TiFSIX-2-Cu-i, 6.5), they are superior to many notable MOFs, such as FJU-36 (2.8), ST- sod -Co/Ti (1.7) and SNNU-17 (1.2) . This enhanced selectivity can be attributed to the uncoordinated pyrazyl N atoms in the MOF backbone that facilitate the strong interactions with C 2 H 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%