2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-012-9742-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for 3-D hydraulic fracturing simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluid flow in the crack was solved using a finite difference method. Schrefler and co-workers [10][11][12] modelled a cohesive fracture using the FEM but included a mesh adaptation scheme so that propagating fractures in arbitrary directions can be modelled in two-and three-dimensional situations. Hydraulic fracturing was investigated in a permeable material by Sarris and Papanastasiou [13] with a finite element analysis including cohesive zone elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid flow in the crack was solved using a finite difference method. Schrefler and co-workers [10][11][12] modelled a cohesive fracture using the FEM but included a mesh adaptation scheme so that propagating fractures in arbitrary directions can be modelled in two-and three-dimensional situations. Hydraulic fracturing was investigated in a permeable material by Sarris and Papanastasiou [13] with a finite element analysis including cohesive zone elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should gas pressures increase and fracturing occur at a late stage, a number of models for pressure-induced fracturing exist, although they have not yet been applied to buffer materials for radioactive waste materials (e.g. Boone and Ingraffea, 1990;Réthoré et al, 2008;Secchi and Schrefler, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boone & Ingraffea (1990) developed a numerical model based on the finite element method (FEM) for the poroelastic material where a cohesive zone description was used for the fracture. Using a mesh adaptation scheme in a poroelastic FEM, Schreffler and co-workers (Schrefler et al 2006, Secchi et al 2007, Secchi and Schrefler 2012) simulated propagating hydraulic fractures in a arbitrary directions. Carrier & Granet (2012) used a similar approach with a priori placed interface elements that contained an additional degree of freedom for the pressure in the fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%