1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00942.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for bacteriocin quantification

Abstract: M.L. CABO, M.A. MURADO, M.P. GONZÁ L E Z A ND L . P AS T OR IZ A . 1999. Different aspects of the most commonly used assay methods in the study of bacteriocins were examined. The conditions under which extraction and incubation (including exposure time) take place were analysed, and several different formal models that are usually employed to calculate ID 50 were compared. As an alternative designed to overcome the problems which characterize the response of micro-organisms that are sensitive to bacteriocins, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recombinant piscicolin 126 produced using this expression system had an antibacterial activity similar to those of bacteriocins purified from their native hosts. The MIC 50 of piscicolin 126 against L. monocytogenes 4A increased over time, as has been reported earlier (6), and was within an order of magnitude of other class IIa bacteriocins tested against the same indicator organism (14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recombinant piscicolin 126 produced using this expression system had an antibacterial activity similar to those of bacteriocins purified from their native hosts. The MIC 50 of piscicolin 126 against L. monocytogenes 4A increased over time, as has been reported earlier (6), and was within an order of magnitude of other class IIa bacteriocins tested against the same indicator organism (14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…K ϩ concentrations were measured at 5-s intervals by using a K ϩ ion-selective electrode with an internal reference (Orion Research, Boston, Mass.). Cells of L. monocytogenes 4A from an overnight culture were collected by centrifugation (4,000 ϫ g, 15 min, 4°C), washed twice in a 10% volume of the standard K ϩ buffer (10 mM KCl, 0.2% glucose, 50 mM NaH 2 PO 4 ⅐ Na 2 HPO 4 [pH 6.70]), resuspended to a final OD 600 of 18 (approximately 2.4 ϫ 10 10 cells/ml), and stored on ice for periods no longer than 4 h. Where appropriate, cells were resuspended to 2 ml in buffers of defined pH (pH 5.74, 6.40, 6.70, 7.02, and 7.66) or NaCl concentration (25,50,150, and 300 mM). Cells were equilibrated to 25°C, and K ϩ concentrations in the buffer were determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECP extraction was performed according to the method of Cabo et al (3). Briefly, all the LAB strains were grown overnight at 30°C in MRS broth.…”
Section: Antibacterial Activity Of Ecps Of Labmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) was determined using a broth inhibition assay described by Cabo et al (4). Briefly, 996 l of nutrient broth (inoculated to 0.5% with E. faecalis) was taken in sterile Eppendorf tubes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistant variants were selected using the method described by Rekhiff et al (22). In brief, culture containing 1 ϫ 10 8 to 5 ϫ 10 8 CFU was inoculated in nutrient broth containing alamethicin (4,6,8, and 10 times the IC 50 of the wild-type strain) and incubated at 37°C. After visible growth, the broth culture was serially diluted and plated onto nutrient hard agar without alamethicin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%